[Tumbleweed_Connection]

STOP THE LEFTISTS

---

---

Get On Board and sink the Rats.
Donate by secure server.
Mail checks to:
Free Republic, LLC, PO Box 9771, Fresno, CA 93794
Donations are not tax deductible.

[JoeSixPack1]

He was dam close to stealing it!

[Nathan Jr.]

Isn't there a law against double voting? Someone's got some explaining to do...

[GoldMan]

There's more here.............

[caveat emptor]

Did anyone mention all those registered twice, or more, in the same state. An aquaintance of mine in San Francisco bragged about voting twice for Clinton in 1992, in areas of the city just a few miles apart.

caveat emptor

[Joe Brower]

I am curious how exactly the Dems plan to get around how "touch screen" voting will be used this coming election to scan and record the fingerprints of felons, illegal aliens, double voters, welfare cheats, assorted other deadbeats, etc.

Being a software engineer, there have been articles in the trade pubs that, for the last couple of years, have obliquely referred to this unmentioned application of the technologies used in the new touchscreen systems, although nothing stated outright. It's pretty plain when you read into the articles, though. I've also heard word about how database systems have become much more connected and unified in just the last couple of years, connecting fingerprint, face recog and criminal systems all together.

Put all together, and it's pretty clear that these hordes of dupes that the democrats employ to subvert and cheat the system are going to feel very "disenfranchised" soon after Nov. 5.

[talleyman]

Just scratching the surface - this doesn't count the dead and the fabricated who vote every year. (Yes, my atheist friends, there is proof of life after death - they vote Democrat!)

[Cicero]

There was much comment at the time of the election noting that many college students actually boasted about voting twice, at college and at home. I suspect this is a major source of double voting, and that it, too, mainly leans Democrat.

[weegee]

The 2000 popular vote tally had a 0.51% difference between the top 2 candidates (Gore and President Bush).

There were many states that did not count all votes or exclude all fraudulent votes because the states were not close enough to be in contention. Even the Florida military ballots were not counted (although the lawsuit was won, it came too late to be added to the tally because of when the US Supreme Court decision on other Florida matters came down).

0.51% (1/2 of 1 percent) is well within America's "acceptable" margin of error. While walking in Boston in 2001, I overheard a couple of students admitting to their friends that they voted twice "because they just knew that the Republicans were going to cheat".

We'll never know for certain who really took the national vote but we all have a good idea once the fraudulant vote is excluded. Thank God (literally) that we give every state a voice in the race and don't let the high density populations on the coast dictate the way the nation is run for everyone.

[Madcelt]

Tamminey Hall(cant remember the spelling) all over again. I have said once, I will say it again. "I dont put anything past them(dems) ANYTHING! at all.

[1Old Pro]

Too bad it wasn't illegal to vote twice or these people could be prosecuted for fraud and violating federal election laws.

( Oh, it is illegal? Oh, they won't be prosecuted. Oh, no wonder they do this )

[taxcontrol]

The voter amendment:

In order to insure that the elections of the United States are fair, all elections within the United States and holdings there of, shall require all voters to prove their identity, citizenship and eligibility to vote.

Each eligible voter must register with the Secretary of State of their single state or territory of residence no less than 30 days prior to an election

Such registration shall require proof of identity and citizenship which shall at a minimum include a state or federal issued photo identification, proof of citizenship and proof of residency.

Such registration shall be valid for a limited time of 24 months from the time of initial registration.

Such registration shall be the ONLY means of qualifying to vote during an election.

The voter registration rolls of each state shall be reviewed each month to purge expired and non-eligible registrations.

[Robert Yoho]

This report only serves to prove what I already wrote in my editorial from September 20, 2002, when I charged that many college students and elderly citizens were voting twice.

If you could eliminate fraud from the voting process, most of the country would have been red for President Bush.

http://www.american-partisan.com/cols/2002/yoho/qtr3/0920.htm

[Gophack]

If only 3,500 people actually voted twice nationwide, that's not that big. It's the POTENTIAL of the 316,000 people voting twice that is the problem. Registrars need to do a better job at purging their rolls.

In 1994 I worked on a campaign in California where I identified over 700 people registered two OR MORE times in one district. In 1996 I did research on a campaign where hundreds of people were registered twice and identified 16 people who actually VOTED twice. In that race, the Democrat won by 82 votes, and I only did a cursory examination of the voter rolls. The Democrats STOLE that race.

[FollowingTheGrace]

Something I have not ever seen mentioned: In a neighboring county (Richland Co., SC) they used electronic voting for the first time in 2000. There were many stories circulating that at some polling places it was easy to simply get back into line and vote again if you were so inclined.
(btw, no problems in my county-Lexington- where we used the infamous punch cards)