Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans, All Dressed up, But Nothing More Than Empty Suits
Vanity ^ | 10/09/02 | B. A. Conservative

Posted on 10/09/2002 8:58:50 AM PDT by B. A. Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-223 last
To: Inkie; Jim Robinson; steve50; JohnGalt; fporretto; George Frm Br00klyn Park; tacticalogic; ...
There is a definite difference between wishful thinking and the science of change. Change begins at the margin and gradually spreads toward the mainstream. If you want to change the course of America, particularly a 180 degree turn to the right, appealling to the left or to the middle is definitely not starting at the margin. I am far enough to the right to definitely be at the margin, and the bell-shaped curve tells me that there are other marginal voters who should be as committed to restoring the Constitution as I am. When election margins are close, marginal voters become far more important. For the sake of argument, let's draw the line you are referring to at 95%. By that I mean 95% of all voters are to the left of the group that I am appealling to with the Contract with Congress. If I could reach and persuade only 5% of all voters to adopt the Contract with Congress, it would be an absolute certainty that we could dictate the entire Republican Party Platform. Why? Because it would be impossible for virtually any Republican candidate to be elected without our support.

In very close elections as we have been experiencing for a decade now, I might have to reach and persuade only 1-3% of traditionally Republican voters or considerably less than half of the 5% of all voters discussed above. There are already 1-3% of voters that have left the Republican Party and joined the Libertarians and other Constitutionally oriented parties. By the time the 2004 election rolls around, we might have our 5% of all voters.

As for the current election and the immediate effects of winning or losing, your time oriented goals are both in need of realignment. In the long term scope of things, judicial appointments are significant. But with the exception of the Supreme Court appointments and those to the Circuit Courts of Appeal, it will take a decade or two before any relevant changes can occur. But even the Supreme Court appointments will have limiting influences. Liberal judges have no trouble legislating law from the bench. Judges who respect the Constitution are not going to legislate. At best they will change one unconstitutional law at a time. Your time horizon says that it took us 70 years to get to the awful state that we are presently in and that it could well take 70 years to get back what we once had.

It is delusional to believe that the United States will continue to exist in its present incarnation for 70 more years. I believe that if you will examine the evidence for yourself, that you will find that it is wishfull thinking to believe the United States can last 20 years.

The unfunded liabilities of Medicare begin maturing in 2008. The baby boom generation starts reaching the minimum Social Security retirement age in late 2008. The unfunded liabilities of Social Security begin maturing in 2012. And the boomers reach Medicare eligibility in 2011. The unfunded liabilities of Medicare and Social Security are estimated to be roughly 12 trillion dollars. The current debt exceeds 6 trillion and will exceed 8 trillion by 2012. Current GDP is roughly 10 trillion and the federal budget is roughly 2 trillion. Assuming 3% annual growth in GDP (extremely optimistic in my opinion), in 2012 we are looking at a $13.5 trillion economy. At 5%, interest payments for the United States government will equal half of all current federal revenues and federal deficits will be ballooning. I will ask the doubters four questions:

All democracies throughout history have ended in bankruptcy. When voters discover they can vote themselves payments from the public treasury, Pandora's box has been opened. The XVIth and XVIIth Amendments (both ratified in 1913) brought the US much closer to a democracy than to the republic given to us by the Founders. Prior to the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913, federal tax revenues never exceeded 6% of GDP as opposed to our current 20%. The 1912 dollar bought 99 cents worth of 1789 goods and services. In the US today, two out of every three dollars spent by the federal government are payments to individuals or groups for which no products are delivered or no services rendered. The 2002 dollar buys 5 cents worth of 1913 goods and services. The US began life with debts from the Revolutionary War of $75 million (that's right million with an M), but had reduced that to a mere 38 thousand dollars by 1836. The debt ballooned to a staggering 3 billion (that's billion with a B) after the implementation of the Federal Reserve and WWI. By 1965 it was a mere 325 billion when LBJ began cranking up the War on Poverty reaching the first trillion by 1981 and the second trillion by 1986. And we are still adding roughly a trillion every five years.

Look back at your answers to my four questions. If we do not turn the United States around a full 180 degrees within the next three election cycles, there will be no Presidential election in 2016. It is not politically possible to tax Americans sufficiently to pay the unfunded liabilities of Medicare and Social Security while financing our existing deficits. There are only two ways these unfunded liabilities can be met:

When the "full faith and credit of the United States" is a meaningless term and no one will accept dollar bills in exchange for goods and services, like all other democracies throughout history, the United States will be bankrupt. That day is going to arrive before 2016.

Government taxes exceed the cost of housing, food, clothing and transportation for almost half of all American families. The NASDAQ bubble has burst. The DOW and S&P bubbles are rapidly deflating. The dollar and bond bubbles are precarious. The credit bubble is still inflating thanks to Americans who are taxed to the point of having to borrow to meet daily living expenses. Look at your four answers again.

Change begins at the margin. I am at the outer limits of the margin. Change has begun. America's future is the Contract with Congress. Or the United States' future will come to an abrupt halt before 2016. Your 70-year time line went up in smoke with the NASDAQ.

221 posted on 10/20/2002 7:23:27 AM PDT by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Inkie
In the big picture, it doesn't matter whether we elect Democrats or socialistic Republicans, it only affects the length of time until the financial collapse of the United States by mere days, a few months at the most. Unless we have my kind of elections, the results of the few remaining elections in America are not going to really matter at all.
222 posted on 10/20/2002 7:50:34 AM PDT by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Flashman_at_the_charge
You got that right!
223 posted on 10/20/2002 8:04:00 AM PDT by JJaxon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-223 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson