[Anti-Bubba182]

DONATE TODAY!!!. SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

[aruanan]

CIA undermines Bush over Iraqi chemical weapons

CIA: Clinton In Action

[holyscroller]

Looks like the Clinton Rats are still running the CIA.

[per loin]

Remind me. Wasn't it the CIA who prevented the 911 attacks by their accurate assessment of what al Queda was planning?

[hosepipe]

Did'nt Clinton appoint George Tenet!..? Hmm...

[Vets_Husband_and_Wife]

WE got rid of Freeh.. now we need to get rid of Tenent!!

[Schmedlap]

I want Hussein removed from power as much as anyone else, probably more so. But to discount any suggestion that this may be imprudent on the basis that the suggestion is in disagreement with my position seems illogical.

per loin asked:
"Wasn't it the CIA who prevented the 911 attacks by their accurate assessment of what al Queda was planning?"

And The Great Satan pointed out:
"... their assessments last year proved as good as the ones they provided to Bush Sr. before the invasion of Kuwait, when they told him Saddam was no threat."

Are we to discount the report based on past oversight by the reporting body, rather than upon the merits, or lack thereof, of the actual report?

hosepipe wrote:
"Did'nt Clinton appoint George Tenet!..? Hmm..."

What does that have to do with the substance of the report?

aruanan declares:
"CIA: Clinton In Action"

holyscroller suggests:
"Looks like the Clinton Rats are still running the CIA."

dfwgator wrote:
"Their assessments are as good as the map of Belgrade the pilots used when they bombed the Chinese Embassy."

On what basis are these claims made?

Vets_Husband_and_Wife proclaimed:
"WE got rid of Freeh.. now we need to get rid of Tenent!!"

Why?

I wrote this post under the assumption that each of the quotes above is in response to the post that began this thread, as opposed to some random thought. Why the negative reaction towards the CIA report? I'm curious what your reasoning is.

[CWRWinger]

Adding one more thing to this, "A house divided cannot stand". Mr. Bush's house is obviously divided. It appears from the polls, that the American people and FreeRepublic want a President who's house is divided.
Besides, he's a Republican, that's all that really matters anyway. </sarcasm off>

Bush-Bots should not complain at all when things like this happen. Has anyone told Mr. Bush it's okay to put a conservative in the CIA?