1 posted on
10/11/2002 12:24:35 AM PDT by
Nogbad
To: 11B3; abwehr; Alamo-Girl; angkor; aristeides; Betty Jo; Black Jade; boston_liberty; cake_crumb; ...
ping
2 posted on
10/11/2002 12:25:24 AM PDT by
Nogbad
To: Nogbad
So, he's claiming that the WTC/Pentagon attacks were diversions for the anthrax attacks? Because he can't be claiming the reverse and expect to be taken seriously: the anthrax attacks happened weeks after the WTC/Pentagon attacks, not before.
3 posted on
10/11/2002 12:32:58 AM PDT by
sourcery
To: Nogbad
You'll get plenty of naysayers, but I think he's right. Over time, I expect to see a pattern emerge of small-scale attacks like this designed to keep LEOs too busy to uncover the plans for the big ones.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson