To: chance33_98
Does anyone believe that the dinosaur could still have soft tissue and undigested food in its stomach after 77 million years? Even with the most modern embalming methods and a completely dry atmosphere (i.e. Egypt)it would still only last thousands of years.
Scientists would have to do alot of explaining before I'll buy into that age.
Godspeed, The Dilg
5 posted on
10/11/2002 2:07:45 AM PDT by
thedilg
To: thedilg
Wait 'till they find one of these guys running around in the woods! THEN ask how it's ancestors all died out 65 million years ago!
To: thedilg
In Montana and North Dakota, things keep well and time passes at a different pace than in the rest of the world.
To: thedilg
You bring new meaning to that phrase "reading between the lines." The idea is to deduce from the information given, not to fabricate inaccurate information.
To: thedilg
Scientists would have to do alot of explaining before I'll buy into that age. I agree. If it were something that made more sense like virgin birth,creating the world in 6 days,parting the Red Sea,etc,etc,etc it would be MUCH more believable.
To: thedilg
Does anyone believe that the dinosaur could still have soft tissue and undigested food in its stomach after 77 million years? I interpreted the article to mean that they have fossilized soft tissue. An exceedingly rare event.
To: thedilg
You are showing that your's was, at best, a narrow education.
92 posted on
10/11/2002 12:32:37 PM PDT by
Wolfstar
To: thedilg
Does anyone believe that the dinosaur could still have soft tissue and undigested food in its stomach after 77 million years? Even with the most modern embalming methods and a completely dry atmosphere (i.e. Egypt)it would still only last thousands of years.
There's chitin on scorpionids that still has its original coloration. In addition, your "would" still doesn't follow. If this dinosaur, indeed, is 77 million years old, then what you believe about what could or could not be possible is irrelevant. Besides, they said that the tissue was fossilized. It was called a mummy because of the degree to which soft tissue was preserved, not because it was merely dried out like an Egyptian mummy.
126 posted on
10/11/2002 1:49:24 PM PDT by
aruanan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson