Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Professional doodlers lead the “NRA=Sniper”campaign
www.cagle.com ^ | 10/11/02

Posted on 10/11/2002 12:12:48 PM PDT by dead

















Believe it or not, this one’s from one of Cuba’s non-imprisoned political commentators:

Stalin himself couldn’t have rousted his propagandists faster than these mono-thought “artists” have swung into action. This one’s gonna be rough.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Yakboy
I never even considered that it might be a flame.

The problem with letting the fairies hide under their beds is that they're all trying to get the government to force us to join them.

Good luck with that plan, wusses.

41 posted on 10/11/2002 7:24:31 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult; El Gato; Go Dub Go
Apparently, when Go Dub Go asks such rhetorical questions at his circle-jerk, wine-and-brie, liberal get-togethers, the other participants just ooooh and aaaaah and label him "the smart one."

But when his oh-so-wise trite platitudes are challenged, he simply tucks his tail between his legs and torricellis away.

42 posted on 10/11/2002 7:30:15 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dead
I like the first one. Note the armed man is the one walking around WITHOUT a target on his chest. The other main point of interest is that the targets are looking nervously at a gun pointed AWAY from them. A brilliant summing up of certain people's attitudes toward law-abiding gun owners, symbolized by the man with the NRA button.
43 posted on 10/11/2002 7:30:31 PM PDT by NovemberCharlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NovemberCharlie
Actually, if you just put a triumphant and confident smile on the armed citizen, it could be an NRA ad.
44 posted on 10/11/2002 7:43:09 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Freemyland
,i>"Yep. Just like the libs were successful in characterizing semiautomatic rifles as "assault rifle", they will now try to characterize bolt action rifles as "sniper rifles."

Well, we've been predicting this for some time now, and it's now happening. Amazing how this coincides with the anti-.50 cal hysteria, the impending sunset of the '94 Crime Bill's restrictions, and even a possible ban on all "hunting ammo" in Los Angeles, isn't it? I'm not saying this is somehow orchestrated by the left (even I don't think they'd stoop to that level to push their tyranny through), but damn if they're not going to ride this wave for all it's worth.

That said, I'd almost be willing to let Congress pass all the stupid, wacko gun bans they want...provided they make the likes of Michael Moore, Rosie, Sarah Brady, the multitude of Hollyweird types, and Chuckie Schumer knock on doors and try to collect the newly-banned firearms. Let 'em put their money where their big, fat, festering, slimy mouths are. You want 'em ? Come get 'em...

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

45 posted on 10/11/2002 8:03:37 PM PDT by wku man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Go Dub Go
How would any of the victims or bystanders prevented anything if they were armed? Or how would they have stopped the sniper in the first place if they were armed?

the sniper's target obviously can't stop the attack. The point is that an armed citizen nearby may stop the sniper after the rifle goes "boom" and the sniper is trying to escape. Sooner or later the sniper's escape route is going to cross the path of a bird watcher or landscaper or surveyor etc.

46 posted on 10/11/2002 10:10:01 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
I'll try to get a paper copy, it was certainly published online as you can see. I'd love to see these hate mongers punished but somehow I doubt they will ever suffer a loss in court. As an NRA member, it makes me mad as hell!

The BEST WAY we can fight these losers is to TAKE BACK THE SENATE IN NOVEMBER, then we can light some real fires under their asses.

47 posted on 10/12/2002 8:07:57 AM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Personally I think Darryl Cagle wins the biggest liar, biggest slanderer and biggest loser award with his cartoon at the top of this page. What a friggin' moron.
48 posted on 10/12/2002 8:09:50 AM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Go Dub Go
How would any of the victims or bystanders prevented anything if they were armed? Or how would they have stopped the sniper in the first place if they were armed?

In any given instance they might or might not. But as a matter of probabilities the existence of an armed populace raises the ante enought to be a significant deterrent.

It is just like seat belts. In a particular accident they might or might not save your life. There are rare incidents where they are actually harmful. But when you look at a large number of accidents seat belts are very effective in preventing injury.

Why the general populace and the media can understand this principle when applied in some areas, but refuses to accept reality in other areas is a mystery to me.

49 posted on 10/12/2002 8:26:30 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
Because the general populace is generally stupid?
50 posted on 10/12/2002 8:37:51 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Go Dub Go
How would any of the victims or bystanders prevented anything if they were armed? Or how would they have stopped the sniper in the first place if they were armed?

The following might be expected, for one:

***...Police report that the sniper was possibly wounded, and fled the scene in a white van with two flat tires, a shot-away front windshiled, and several dozen bullet holes of several sizes in the passenger side of the vehicle....***

Indeed, it may not be possible to prevent a sniper who is willing to give his life in the attempt from making a first-shot kill among an armed populace. There have been several such instances of such in the urban terrorism taking place in Israel. But in such instances, the citizenry can actively assist each other in containing such a creature until better trained and equipped police or military forces can arrive in number to deal with the remainder of the problem- and the same sniper is far less likely to make successful repeat or subsequent attempts.

That's not at all to say that the Israelis can or have been successful every time; they lost 21 killed in one horrible day last spring, with ten soldiers killed in one shooting episode with one very skillful or very lucky enemy sniper. But whether these in the Washington area are terrorist-directed shootings or not, the terrorists are certainly noting their effectiveness and will follow them up, whether with more such shootings, suicide bombings in crowds such as Israel has seen, or whatever other methods they think will work best.

51 posted on 10/12/2002 11:27:20 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dead

52 posted on 10/12/2002 11:31:32 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archy
Thanks for that one!
53 posted on 10/12/2002 6:18:03 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunRunner; dead
How about this for a best-case outcome... An armed, law-abiding citizen (preferably someone intelligent and telegenic) shoots and kills the sniper, putting an end to the terror.

A bit far fetched, but it'd sure be sweet to see. The anti-gunners would be so PO'd.

54 posted on 10/12/2002 6:35:53 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dead

55 posted on 10/15/2002 1:37:03 AM PDT by ezo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
...and we can't forget the doodlings of Carlson:


56 posted on 10/15/2002 4:14:45 PM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson