Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joesnuffy
Crutcher said he does not believe Hill intended to cause harm. He said Hill's actions apparently resulted from a misunderstanding of proper procedure.

Why the hell is the state epedemiologist defending this guy?

This is criminal, plain and simple.

I think somebody needs to look into Crutcher's background to determine why he is defending Hill.

12 posted on 10/12/2002 11:29:35 AM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
Why the hell is the state epedemiologist defending this guy?

Look how long it took for them to require dentists use sterilized equipment. They weren't doing much with the instruments between patients even after HIV came out. The problem with inspections in hospitals and clinics is that they are scheduled well in advance so people get everything in tip-top shape for the inspectors and then they can get back into their usual routines afterwards. If inspections were reasonable but spur-of-the-moment, they might reveal real things going on.

16 posted on 10/12/2002 11:33:52 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson