Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Day-care costs rival college
Pioneer Press ^ | 10.13.02 | BOB SHAW

Posted on 10/13/2002 12:18:19 PM PDT by wallcrawlr

At more than $12,000 a year, the rising cost of day care in Minnesota has blown past that of many college tuitions.

That fact has a local advocacy group suggesting a radical solution: college-style financing. Grants, subsidies and loans should all be available to help parents cover the cost of caring for small children, the group says.

"That is the dream," said Sharon Henry-Blythe, director of the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association.

The U.S. Department of Education has given the organization a $350,000 grant to study the issue. Among the ideas: a one-stop financial aid office.

The cost of day-care centers nationally has increased about 58 percent over the past 10 years, according to one report, roughly twice the rate of inflation over the same period; in the Twin Cities, the cost spiked 8 percent between the end of 2000 and the end of 2001.

Experts cite several reasons:

Labor costs. Day-care jobs used to pay minimum wage, industry officials say. Now, employers want to attract college graduates. Between 1992 and 2001, the average weekly wage for a child-care worker in Minnesota rose 57 percent, while the average worker's wage rose 44 percent, according to state figures.

More intensive programs. At Children's World Learning Centers, for example, classes from German to karate to gymnastics are available for preschoolers.

The emergence of high-cost centers in the suburbs. New Horizon Day Care, the largest chain in the state, has added 18 new centers in the past 10 years — with 17 in the suburbs. The construction costs can be steep: A New Horizon center, with computers, toys and furnishings, costs about $2.5 million.

The cost is constantly on the minds of parents.

"We had a conversation about this at work today. We were talking about how we don't need cable TV, don't need two nice cars," said Lakeville mom and school psychologist Kari Komar. But she does need the part-time day care for her two children, at $10,000 a year.

She was picking up her 18-month-old daughter, Jordan, at a New Horizon Day Care Center in Lakeville, a state-of-the-art facility with a toy-filled great room, security cameras, and hallways lined with specialized classrooms. She explained that her husband and she "weighed everything, and for right now and for the long run, this is what is right for us."

For years, day-care experts have looked jealously at the glut of funding options for college — private grants, government loans, scholarships and subsidies. They note that a drumbeat of advertisements from investment firms and banks remind parents to save for college. Yet what parent saves for the even greater cost of day care?

"No one plans day care 18 years in advance," said Chad Dunkley, vice president for New Horizon.

And while college costs can be adjusted to fit family needs, the costs of day care are as unyielding as a utility bill.

"Early childhood (care) does not have that," said Henry-Blythe. "There is no way now to determine how to lower the costs for people based on income."

That may change. The Minnesota group is one of four nationwide participating in the Early Education Finance Demonstration Project — the others are in Fairfax, Va.; Seattle; and Kansas City — that will make recommendations within 18 months.

As a first concrete step, the Twin Cities group will create an "online eligibility calculator" to allow parents to see what existing government subsidies or tax breaks are available.

But private money is the new frontier.

According to Nancy Johnson, director of the Early Education Finance Demonstration Project in Minneapolis, tuition pays 23 percent of the total cost of higher education, with the rest subsidized by the government and private sources. But parents pay 60 percent of day-care costs, and almost all the remainder comes from government. Only 1 percent comes from private sources.

"We need to create more ways to bring more subsidies in. We have got to bring in private subsidies from 3M, Cargill, whatever," Henry-Blythe said.

Some in the field say the trends simply can't continue.

"We just can't keep charging parents more. They simply can't afford it," said Karen Fogolin of the Minnesota Child Care Resources and Referral Network. "But we can't do it on the backs of the providers, either."

The cost of care nationally has increased 58 percent in 10 years — double the inflation rate — for a 3-year-old in a day-care center, according to Runzheimer International, a Rochester, Wis., firm specializing in cost-of-living data.

In Ramsey County, the average cost for infants in day-care centers is about $12,000 a year. Compare that to the cost of full-time tuition at the University of Minnesota — $6,280.

Does that mean day care is too expensive?

No, said Sue Molstad, of Resources for Child Caring, a nonprofit based in Minneapolis. Molstad said that wages for day-care workers still remain low.

Minnesota child-care workers enjoyed a sharp increase in their average weekly pay from 1992 to 2001 — roughly 57 percent, to $487 — but they still make less than the average worker, who earns $704, according to Jay Mousa, research director for the Minnesota Department of Economic Security.

The median hourly wage for a child-care worker in the Twin Cities is $8.44, according to state figures. The median salary for a child-care worker in the Twin Cities is $17,547. The top 10 percent of child-care workers in the Twin Cities earn $23,832 or more.

Those labor costs can't be spread out over more students the way they can in high school or college.

"If you have a child in the university, he could be in a class where 700 kids get instruction at one time. With infants, the ratio is 4-to-1," said Cherie Kotilinek, of the state Department of Children, Families and Learning.

Said New Horizon's Dunkley: "Even at a weekly rate of $240, that's $4.80 per hour (for 50 hours of care). That's less than you'd pay a 15-year-old to go out on a Friday night."

The competition for day-care centers is often the house just down the street.

The cost of in-home care is about two-thirds that of the centers, and there are more of them — 14,126 licensed statewide, compared with 1,616 day-care centers. Each center, of course, can handle far more children, such as the newest New Horizon centers, built for 185 kids.

Day-care centers are more common in the Twin Cities — they make up 13 percent of all licenses in the metro area, compared with 8 percent in greater Minnesota.

Building costs are also partly to blame for the rising costs.

The square-foot cost of building a day-care center is as much as for building a hospital, according to Steve Swanson, vice president of New Horizon. Those expenses get passed along to parents in the form of higher fees.

Stringent building codes and commercial-grade kitchens push up the costs. Fixing up a home to take in children, he said, could mean "putting a fence around the yard and getting some playground equipment."

The growth of day-care centers has been a suburban phenomenon. Figures are elusive, but examples abound of chains of day-care centers that operate almost entirely in the suburbs.

The business follows the money. New Horizon calculates that a family's income needs to be about $75,000 to afford its day care, which now costs $12,480 for an infant, Dunkley said. New Horizon's rates — which are not the most expensive in the area — increased about 68 percent in 10 years.

The next one, and their largest ever, will be in the suburbs — in the Best Buy corporate offices, opening in March in Richfield.

The bottom line for day-care customers is peace of mind, whatever the cost.

"The money guarantees a good, solid upbringing," said Mary Schmidt, as she caressed the hair of her 2-year-old daughter, Elain, comforting her by rocking back and forth in the New Horizon Lakeville center.

"I love this great room. I love the infant room and the low windows" so the kids can see the weather outside, she said.

"I didn't cry when I left her here for the first time."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

1 posted on 10/13/2002 12:18:19 PM PDT by wallcrawlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
It costs us $1000/month for two kids in daycare... never thought I'd say it, but I can't wait until they start going to school!
2 posted on 10/13/2002 12:19:45 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
$12,000

$350,000

58 percent

$2.5 million

Or......Mom could just stay home with the kids!

Oh, that would be too simple.

3 posted on 10/13/2002 12:24:49 PM PDT by oct11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe; wallcrawlr
When we had our third, we sat down and calculated that my wife returning to work would actually cost us money in the long run...after day care expenses, her net income was under $10 a month...worse if she or one of the kids were sick and she had to stay home...

The solution: she now stays at home full-time, and runs a home daycare, providing a valuable service while spending time with our children (most of the daycare kids we watch attend school, so she only has them about 4 hours per day)

4 posted on 10/13/2002 12:29:10 PM PDT by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
Does anyone think this is in the paper this close to the election for a reason? Where would Wellstone stand on this issue?

I say less gvt. = less taxes = more money stays in our pockets = more moms afford to stay home.
5 posted on 10/13/2002 12:30:34 PM PDT by freemama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
she now stays at home full-time, and runs a home daycare

Congratulations on making a great decision!

6 posted on 10/13/2002 12:32:25 PM PDT by oct11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oct11
I agree, staying home with the kids should be the first option. This is ridiculous.
7 posted on 10/13/2002 12:33:45 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oct11
In a way, yes...she still feels guilty about staying at home while I go to work.

However, I explained that my goal was to eventually ALLOW her to stay at home if circumstances permit (the first 10 years of marriage required her to work while I finished grad school and started career-building).

She loved her job, but, she is now more happy, just some lingering guilt. BTW when we married she was a confirmed democrat - it took time, but now she's republican, but the guilt remains I think from her liberal upbringing...it was very damaging - but she is learning that logic does triumph over "feel-good" pathos...but it's a slow process.

8 posted on 10/13/2002 12:35:57 PM PDT by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Having one parent put their brain on hold to stay home with the kids may be a workable solution for two parent families, but frankly, I'd rather see single parents out there in the workforce, rather than living off of welfare.

One thing that never gets mentioned, the child care credit has remained absolutely unchanged since 1981, maybe its time to think about at least keeping it even with inflation.

9 posted on 10/13/2002 12:45:31 PM PDT by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
The U.S. Department of Education has given the organization a $350,000 grant to study the issue.

Does everybody see where this is going?

It won't be too long in the future before Big Brother's Department of Child Rearing gives the "birthing units" [formerly known as 'parents'] six weeks to drop off their "breeding stock" [formerly 'children'] to the "indoctrination centers" ['schools'].

We need to leave child rearing to the professionals. -:]

10 posted on 10/13/2002 1:07:28 PM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
the states could loosen up their regulation of the home-based systems. This would allow more providers and lower costs in many states. The commercial centers have to pay a lot of money for insurance, I believe it may rival the costs they pay for labor. This high insurance cost is because of the tort industry and generally does nobody any good. If zoning laws would allow commercial day care to be set up in single family homes, then this would really cut costs too.
11 posted on 10/13/2002 1:25:08 PM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Look at what their trying to do in Washington, DC. MANDATORY childcare for kids who are as young as 2 1/2.
12 posted on 10/13/2002 1:30:03 PM PDT by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
One of the biggest problems is daycare for older kids kindergarten-age 12 or older. What do you do with them before and after school if you are a single parent and must work to support them? Sports are great, but you still have to get them there and pick them up.

The costs can just about eat up a low income paycheck.

Some say the solution is to get businesses to help support community daycare senters, or to tax for them like schools.

Not everyone can be a stay at home mom by circumstance or temperment. That doesn't mean they aren't political conservatives.
13 posted on 10/13/2002 1:35:26 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hunter112
I can see single parents needing day care, but staying home to raise your children is hardly putting your brain on hold. It is the single most important job of a life time and anyone who does not see it that way has no business having children. That's what birth control is for.
14 posted on 10/13/2002 1:43:53 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Jones
the states could loosen up their regulation of the home-based systems.

It's much better trying to find an unlicensed family day care for your kids. My kids have absolutely refused to go to regular day care centers, they insist they'd run away but they have no problem going to an unlicensed home I use, in fact they like the lady there very very much.

15 posted on 10/13/2002 1:44:47 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
...she still feels guilty about staying at home while I go to work.

How could she possibly feel guilty about staying home to take care of your children, the most important job in the world?
16 posted on 10/13/2002 2:04:22 PM PDT by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eva
It is the single most important job of a life time and anyone who does not see it that way has no business having children.

Amen! Amen!
Maybe people who think being a full-time mother is putting one's brain are the very ones who are putting their brains on hold at the time of conception.
17 posted on 10/13/2002 2:08:19 PM PDT by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: oct11
This story is ludicrous. I can't believe how many people have kids and then pawn them off on someone else to essentially raise. They're all so full of self-importance that they think they can't lower themselves to stay home with small children and change diapers for a few years. My husband and I now have three children and have never used one hour of daycare in our lives. When I work, I do so when my husband is off so he can be with them. I am in the same profession as my husband, so my working full-time would double our income, but I just can't do it and leave my most precious assets (my children) in the care of someone else for the majority of their lives. I have also started homeschooling my two oldest and absolutely love it- nothing could give me more satisfaction. when people ask why I am 'wasting' my education when I could be making so much money, I just laugh and say 'yeah, like I have something better to do with my time than raise and educate my children". I can always go back to work full-time, my kids are only young once. I can sleep well at night knowing that when they are grown and gone, I will have no regrets. I will have a lifetime of love and memories.
18 posted on 10/13/2002 2:12:53 PM PDT by usmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marsh2
Staying home to raise kids is not a political activity. It is a matter of lifestyle. Single parents have it very tough. Raising children is difficult enough in a two parent family. I have no sympathy though for those who choose to work and send their kids to day care if they don't need to.

I used be asked to transport some of the kids of working Moms to sports activities and it was very sad. These kids would talk to me and tell me things that should have been discussed at home because they had no one else to talk to.
They would come to me with their problems and fears and hopes. Their mother never knew what she was missing.
19 posted on 10/13/2002 2:42:52 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eva
We are in agreement on birth control, that's for sure. Most "decisions" to have kids are just making the best of an accidental happenstance. But I've talked to a lot of women who were glad to get back to the intellectual stimulation of their jobs, and I certainly can't say that I blame them. When the most intelligent person in your daytime universe is Barney the Dinosaur, then your brain really does turn to mush!
20 posted on 10/13/2002 3:05:21 PM PDT by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson