Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01
Almost anything is probably better researched than a Reed Irvine report, which takes snippets of other stories, usually with some attribution, to put out a premise that can sometimes be knocked down by 20 minutes of web searching.

Just because we seem to like some of the conclusions in some of the stories doesn't mean any real work or fact checking has actually been done by Irvine's group.

8 posted on 10/13/2002 7:25:09 PM PDT by DmBarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: DmBarch
"Almost anything is probably better researched than a Reed Irvine report..."

Mine didn't refer to a Reed Irvine report.

Rumsfeld notwithstanding, there has never been any question that suppliers like American Culture Depository, under contract from the CDC, shipped anthrax cultures (among others) to Iraq in the eighties.

However, this was the kind of exchange conducted routinely with agricultural colleges and public health authorities in scores of nations.

Anybody that asserts "the U.S. provided Iraq with bioweapons" fails to recognize that a research sample is far removed from a production-run of weaponized spores. It is akin to claiming that "the U.S. provided Japan with the bombs they dropped on Pearl Harbor", simply because we sold the Japanese scrap iron.

9 posted on 10/13/2002 7:35:21 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson