[blam]

The only comments that you and TheJfan have ever made on FR has been to this thread. I'd say you have an agenda.

News/Activism | posts by DeviantMind

#99: At War With EVIL (FReeper GaryMontana)
To: blam
99 posted on 10/17/02 4:10 PM Central by DeviantMind

#97: At War With EVIL (FReeper GaryMontana)
To: texson66
97 posted on 10/17/02 2:56 PM Central by DeviantMind

#94: At War With EVIL (FReeper GaryMontana)
To: texson66
94 posted on 10/17/02 2:08 PM Central by DeviantMind

#93: At War With EVIL (FReeper GaryMontana)
To: 7thson
93 posted on 10/17/02 2:06 PM Central by DeviantMind

#92: At War With EVIL (FReeper GaryMontana)
To: Red Jones
92 posted on 10/17/02 2:01 PM Central by DeviantMind

#91: At War With EVIL (FReeper GaryMontana)
To: Smile-n-Win
91 posted on 10/17/02 1:57 PM Central by DeviantMind

#16: At War With EVIL (FReeper GaryMontana)
To: neutrino
16 posted on 10/14/02 2:59 AM Central by DeviantMind

[TheJFan]

It was a coincidence that I was shown to the forum. Of course, the only comments that I have ever made would be to this thread. It's my first day here. Give me time and I'm sure you will see many responses over all.

The fact that you felt pressed to justify you're automatic suspicion of myself however amuses me. Is the presence of another individual whom has disagreed with the views of others that intimidating? If so, I apologize and will attempt to water down my words in the future, so as not to cause offense.

[DeviantMind]

In truth, the reason that there are no other posts you recognize as being from me is simple: having not logged on for a long time (no internet access), I had forgotten my old log-in and password. It was either Madcat or Madcat 202, but without a password both of those are useless. I decided, also, that a new name would be appropriate.

I find it disappointing that you need to justify yourself by attacking the length of our time on these forums. You have done an outstanding job of steering the conversation away from the point and onto a stage which requires me to defend myself. Bravo, you have displayed the single most used tactic of the uninformed activist.

And of course, the fact that yours was the only post I have read which warranted my response most -CERTAINLY- means I have an agenda. Would you be so kind as to inform me of what it is?

I post to threads which interest me. Yours interested me. This is my right, and I will continue to exercise it. I certainly hope that the moderators of this website will keep in mind that I have not attacked any members, have not instigated any flame wars or anything of the sort when they read this thread. All I did was post my opinion on someone else's article. To attempt to deny me the right to do so is highly un-Constitutional, and hypocritical of all that you folks seem to stand for.

So, is there anyone here who wishes to return to the topic at hand and continue what SHOULD have been an intelligent, educated, mature and highly interesting conversation?

[DeviantMind]

In truth, the reason that there are no other posts you recognize as being from me is simple: having not logged on for a long time (no internet access), I had forgotten my old log-in and password. It was either Madcat or Madcat 202, but without a password both of those are useless. I decided, also, that a new name would be appropriate.

I find it disappointing that you need to justify yourself by attacking the length of our time on these forums. You have done an outstanding job of steering the conversation away from the point and onto a stage which requires me to defend myself. Bravo, you have displayed the single most used tactic of the uninformed activist.

And of course, the fact that yours was the only post I have read which warranted my response most -CERTAINLY- means I have an agenda. Would you be so kind as to inform me of what it is?

I post to threads which interest me. Yours interested me. This is my right, and I will continue to exercise it. I certainly hope that the moderators of this website will keep in mind that I have not attacked any members, have not instigated any flame wars or anything of the sort when they read this thread. All I did was post my opinion on someone else's article. To attempt to deny me the right to do so is highly un-Constitutional, and hypocritical of all that you folks seem to stand for.

So, is there anyone here who wishes to return to the topic at hand and continue what SHOULD have been an intelligent, educated, mature and highly interesting conversation?