[TomB]

I look at it this way. No matter what she says from now on she will NEVER get the support of the militant pro-lifers out there, so it isn't worth even worrying about. Remember, these are the same people who say Bush isn't "pro-life enough" desipte probably doing more for the movement than Reagan.

I pray that one day these people see how much damage they actually do to the pro-life movement.

[BenLurkin]

Pro-lifers such as myself have got to recognize that there are a plethora of evils facing our nation. We need good and capable Pro-American people in office and must not allow the "Death to America" democrat party to destroy this country. Yes, the tought of the murdered children breaks my heart, but there is a great deal at stake overall.

[r9etb]

I pray that one day these people see how much damage they actually do to the pro-life movement.

While I do agree with the ultimate goal, their rejection of incrementalism is bound to fail. Sure it's a moral issue. But it's also a political issue, and politics is correctly called "the art of the possible." I tink it should be clear to everybody that the all or nothing approach does not work. Incrementalism will -- and probably a lot faster than people think.