Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon may get involved in sniper hunt
CNN

Posted on 10/15/2002 9:15:21 AM PDT by newsperson999

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-234 next last
To: colorado tanker
"The posse comitatus act was passed to end Reconstruction"

Directing the united States military to rape, pillage, immolate and murder civilians was Abe Lincoln's (Republican) idea.

Reconstruction was a Republican idea.

George Bush is merely following the party line.
41 posted on 10/15/2002 9:37:21 AM PDT by Dr Warmoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right
With due respect to colleagues on this board, the [notion that our armed forces can only serve in Kosovo] has outlived its usefulness.

You misspelled [constitution].

42 posted on 10/15/2002 9:37:28 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
Homeland Security has no personnel, no funding and no authority. At present, Tom Ridge is merely an advisor to the President.

Refer all further questions to Tom Daschle.

Got a phone number?

43 posted on 10/15/2002 9:37:44 AM PDT by WarSlut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
Sadly Yes, some time ago...


44 posted on 10/15/2002 9:37:46 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WarSlut
What link?
45 posted on 10/15/2002 9:37:47 AM PDT by Lobbyist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
Why is this not a Homeland Security Department issue instead of the Pentagon?

Because the Department of Homeland Security does not officially exist yet as part of the government. The Senate is still stalling it's creation. It cannot "issue" anything.

46 posted on 10/15/2002 9:37:56 AM PDT by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Freeper Lady
Perhaps they are talking about National Guard troops. The Guard, when under state orders, can be used for domestic duties. Homeland Security would coordinate, if we had a Homeland Security Department, but thanks to little Tommy, we don't yet.

47 posted on 10/15/2002 9:38:20 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Re: #4 Bingo!
48 posted on 10/15/2002 9:38:38 AM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
The only reason I can think of is if they think it is Al Qaeda related. Otherwise it doesn't make sense at all.

This is Al-Queda related in the same way that Lou Pinella is leaving the Mariners to manage a team that is closer to his family home in Tampa Bay (even though he's managed here for 10 years).

Incrimentialism: the beat goes on. Remember, it will be for our own good.

Tuor

49 posted on 10/15/2002 9:39:10 AM PDT by Tuor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
Sure looks like the feds think so. I don't think that the military would get involved if they thought the sniper went by the name "John" or "Bubba".

I agree .. this be a huge step if it was just a domestic nut case

50 posted on 10/15/2002 9:39:11 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999
I agree that it is important to keep an eye on pentagon troops being deployed.
HOWEVER, what if this is a "training exercise", as another Freeper suggested?
Also, does it break the Constitution if the troops are merely being used in an advisory capacity to assist LE, perhaps as spotters ?
Just thinking.

Tia

51 posted on 10/15/2002 9:39:34 AM PDT by tiamat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
.....Congress give the President the power to attack any nation he wishes without getting their prior approval......

Read this statement to yourself slowly.............
52 posted on 10/15/2002 9:39:52 AM PDT by UB355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Nevermind that it violates the constitution.

It does not. It may violate the law, but not the Constitution. Unless you can point out what part of the Consitution, by Article, section and if necessary paragraph, it violates.

53 posted on 10/15/2002 9:40:06 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WarSlut
It is so long I hate to waste band width posting it.

It can be read here in POST # 44.

54 posted on 10/15/2002 9:40:43 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonCollegeofLaw
A friend of mine went to the Michaels near the Home Depot on Sunday. She was terrified then. I know she's even more frightened now, if that's possible. I also have family in the area, as do any number of freepers. I want them safe. I do not want them to die at the hands of a mass murderer.

I want to find out exactly what role the military is going to play. I do know that the military has been asked to search their records for military with sniper training. Until this story is fleshed out with a few more facts, I'm not going to jump to conclusions.

Oh, and I remember the National Guard in various states being called out for the riots in 1968.

55 posted on 10/15/2002 9:41:16 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Possee Comitatus applies to ACTIVE DUTY troops. It does not apply to National Guard troops.

NG has been involved in the drug war for years.
56 posted on 10/15/2002 9:41:25 AM PDT by Lokibob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999
The use of Troops doesn't bother me if they are under civilian control. Usually, such "extras" can be deputized as US Marshalls.

The possibility of troops indicates the "clues" of this AM, e.g. partial plates of the "creaming" truck didn't prove out. Such possible combinations in relation to vehicles should have been run by now (he switched plates, DUH)....and perhaps it is terroristS - two subjects seen on occassion, possible second car etc etc etc

57 posted on 10/15/2002 9:42:28 AM PDT by Henchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999
Note that this "leak" comes just before authorities are due to release a sketch of last night's suspect. I'll bet the sketch won't look like a "Billy Bob" or a "Bubba," but like an "Achmed" or "Mohammed."
58 posted on 10/15/2002 9:42:52 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999
If everyone in the area who has a camera of some sort, or a camcorder would carry them in their cars, we can get this guy or guys. Many people have a cheap camera lying on a shelf somewhere...
59 posted on 10/15/2002 9:43:02 AM PDT by Snowy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Find in the constitution where the federal government is authorized to prosecute crimes other than treason, piracy and counterfeitting.

So why can't they just aid in the capture of these guys by helping the locals? Once the guys are busted, the proper athorities take them.
So why is the sky falling here?
The article says nothing about how the pentagon may be used.
I believe many are over reacting.

60 posted on 10/15/2002 9:43:35 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-234 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson