Posted on 10/15/2002 5:15:33 PM PDT by Pokey78
Poor fella my country. Australia, where relaxation is the aim of life and nothing is to be taken too seriously, has been slammed in the guts. Australia's mantra, which you may hear uttered hundreds of times in a day, is, "No worries, mate." "She'll be right," Australians say, or used to say, and believed what they said.
In one terrible instant that complacent optimism has been destroyed. In a small population of 19 million, the massacre of perhaps 180 citizens on the holiday island of Bali will have touched every family. Everyone knows someone who didn't come home from their holidays or whose child didn't come home.
Like the Americans after September 11 they are asking, "Why us?" They feel malice towards no one. Why should they be the target of the malice of others?
When I was growing up in Australia, I was taught that Australia's standard of living made it the envy of the world, but the Bali bombing was not in any obvious way an attack by have-nots on the haves. I know now that the Australian economy is small, and that as a producer of raw materials Australia is in competition with the poorest countries in the world.
The paradox of a poor country which remains undeveloped while its citizens squander their substance on what they are proud to call a "sophisticated recreational lifestyle" has always struck me as painful.
The vast country lies as defenceless as a turtle on its back, because there is not sufficient wealth in the economy to underwrite the cost of developing any kind of infrastructure along the endless coastline. Though the ragged millions to the north might envy whole mountain ranges made of pure iron ore, they have never tried to annex them.
The rest of the world lets Australian uranium mines operate with impunity. The international community did not support the desperate attempts of the aborigines to prevent the release of radioactive poison from the earth. It did not occur to Australians to think that they might be getting away with murder.
Australians thought that they could get along with everyone. The Australian passport was welcome everywhere, as American and British passports were not. The only way to get along with everyone is to take sides with no one, but successive Australian governments have chosen to ignore this obvious fact.
In 1939, prime minister Robert Menzies declared war on Germany before Britain did, probably because he needed to silence considerable opposition to the war on the part of Irish-Australians by bringing in war-time restrictions on freedom of speech and association. The assumption was that Britain would defend Australia against any threat of Japanese invasion. In the event, Singapore was sacrificed, and Australia left defenceless.
Meanwhile, Australian pilots were training in Canada and would eventually be involved with other colonials in the Battle of Britain. Their involvement in the Second World War cost the Dominions dear, New Zealand suffering the highest per capita mortality of any Allied country. When wave after wave of Japanese planes attacked Darwin in February 1942, they met no resistance.
In the event inertia may have been the best defence. Any foreign power that invaded Australia from the north would pretty soon wish it hadn't. The limitless expanse offers no support of any kind; there were no forts or railheads for the Japanese to capture, and either too much water or none at all.
The abandonment of the Japanese offensive may have left the Australian population feeling that its cocoon of arid distance protected it more effectively than any army could have done, but Australians should also have been warned that they could not rely on any outside power when push came to shove.
This being so, Australia would seem best-advised not to rush to be involved in other people's quarrels, but what we see is that Australia is still determined to be in at every fight.
Australia sent troops to Korea, to Vietnam and to the Gulf. Readiness to be involved in Asia might conceivably be explained as a rational response to the fiction that the wars there were being fought to defend Australia from communist imperialism. Why Australia was so keen to be involved in the Gulf war must remain a mystery.
Australian involvement in that conflict meant very little to its allies, the actual contribution being minuscule, because during the 1980s the Australian defence establishment had gradually and deliberately been reduced to next to nothing.
Perhaps the thinking was that if Australia lined up with the United States in 1991 it could count on American support if ever it was needed, as it certainly would be in the event of aggression from without. Eagerness to be involved in the Gulf actually marked Australia as a conspicuous member of what was perceived as the pro-Israel axis.
In East Timor, Australians came up against another unpleasant fact. America refused to help them with men or materiel in their peacekeeping commitments, and billions of dollars were drained from the public purse. The ultimate effect was probably what America would have desired.
Australia increased spending on defence, enough to have an impact on the Australian economy but not enough to make them important players in the international war-game. Australia then volunteered men and materiel for the American-led operation in Afghanistan, where it is still involved.
Perhaps the bombing of the Sari Club in Bali should not have come as such a surprise. Terrorism is not a substitute for war, but a preparative. The purpose of instilling terror is to force a polarisation of conflict by making neutrality an impossibility, so that armed confrontation becomes inevitable.
By mounting an attack that would be universally seen as vicious, cowardly and unprovoked, the perpetrators have forced a largely nonchalant Australia into the enemy camp. Australian defence spending will certainly increase, with little effect on Australia's stature as an ally and policy maker but with crushing impact on the Australian people. Already, funding for essential social services has been cut and long-term welfare initiatives are being abandoned.
Meanwhile, tension between Muslims and non-Muslims in Australia is mounting, fuelled by media massaging of deplorable cases of gang-rapes of girls who happened to be Christian by boys who happened to be Muslim.
In allowing the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, to be the first to identify the Bali bombers as al-Qa'eda, American intelligence has sent an ill-prepared Australia into the front line.
What an idiot.
Oh no! Nothing can come between Aussies and the government teet!
Nor can she get out of the Blame America mode even now. Australians were attacked in Bali because of some unstated and tenuous connection to American policies? Garbage!
The only way to get along with everyone is to take sides with no one, but successive Australian governments have chosen to ignore this obvious fact.
And wisely, too, because it is neither obvious nor a fact. Who, after all, did Poland offend in the 30s? China? Singapore? Hong Kong? Norway? Denmark?
And then we have the real howler, the notion that a Japanese invasion would have melted away from the harsh terrain. I note only that the jungles didn't seem to bother it elsewhere in Asia, nor did similar desert terrain hold Rommel back very much in North Africa. Armed oppositon was the only thing that did in both cases.
The fact is that Germaine Greer has a doctrinaire approach to world affairs that is unfounded on anything but her fond imaginings and a past longing for world socialism, and is characterized in every detail by utter failure: failed theories, failed doctrines, and failed, fascist societies for which she was on the very front of defense.
I am constantly amazed at the ignorance of so-called journalists. Australia has been an ally of ours for decades. Think they may even be a signator to the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO), if it still exists.
A strong military usually seems to stimulate the economy and industrial innovation, the same as NASA. When the government goes after cutting edge technology, you are creating real jobs, production jobs at that. Beurocratic desk jockeys just don't cut it. And making weapons of war triggers a stronger sense of purpose than building roads. Better focus. More belief in the importance of what one is doing.
At the same time, Aussies make great soldiers. They are tough, resourceful, and top notch at hot desert fighting. I see them filling an important need for the Free World with light infantry, special forces, and perhaps airborne paratroopers. They need not go into mech units or air force so much, unless they really want to. Light infantry can be low cost comparatively speaking.
I honestly cannot believe the writer had the chutzpah to write this. I wonder what the reaction of most Aussies will be when they read it.
Perhaps the thinking was that if Australia lined up with the United States in 1991 it could count on American support if ever it was needed, as it certainly would be in the event of aggression from without. Eagerness to be involved in the Gulf actually marked Australia as a conspicuous member of what was perceived as the pro-Israel axis.
Miss Greer notwithstanding, I believe that there are a hell of a lot of us Americans who appreciate the support of the Aussies through WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, etc.. And we are there for them when they need us. At least I am.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.