Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CHICAGOFARMER
Well, you obviously didn't bother to read the page that I provided a link to in my last post. I guess I'll have to spell it out for you....

This is from that page:

*snip*
"It is a felony in Maryland to "wilfully" [sic] intercept, attempt to intercept, or have someone else intercept on one's behalf any wire, oral or electronic communication."

Note that it wire, oral OR electronic communication. It's you that "doesn't [or refuses to] see the light" here. The law is not restricted to telephone conversations; it includes face-to-face oral communications as well. Do you get it now ??? If it's not clear to you yet, here's more from the same source....

*snip*
""Oral communication" means any conversation or words spoken to or by any person "in private conversation." Maryland courts have read this definition to require a reasonable expectation of privacy in the circumstances of an intercepted oral communication in order for the communication to be protected under the statute."

It can't be much plainer than that. You are wrong.

163 posted on 10/18/2002 7:00:34 PM PDT by Vigilant1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilant1
I have to qualify the last post I made by saying that you are wrong about the part about me being "wrapped up in the telephone recording law", as it has a much wider scope than just telephone recordings. I won't repeat what I already posted about your illegal office recordings, or your neighbor pointing a camcorder into your open window and recording cops executing a search warrant; if you still don't get that, then your cognitive dissonance won't allow you to comprehend it with repetition.

And yes, I already said (if you had bothered to read my post, which you clearly didn't) that you can stand on your lawn and tape whatever you want (but the fedgovthugs will likely seize your camcorder and/or tapes).

So please try reading my posts first, and then respond.

164 posted on 10/18/2002 7:13:24 PM PDT by Vigilant1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilant1
You still don't get it!

This for hire type of recording. Did you notice that.

You can record your own voice any time you like on your property in your house.

Why don't you check current court cases that support your position that you can not record your own voice in your own home or on your own property. You will not find any as described above.

You are so paronoid about the hundreds of thosands of laws you can shit without asking for permission.

Does this make more sense??


167 posted on 10/19/2002 2:48:53 PM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson