Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vigilant1
Just how many convictions under that MD conversation recording law have there been? To what level of appeal have any been taken?
174 posted on 10/22/2002 2:27:00 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
bvw:
"Just how many convictions under that MD conversation recording law have there been? To what level of appeal have any been taken?"

I remember seeing in the many articles about Linda Tripp violating the telephone clause of the Maryland wiretap statute when she taped Monica Lewinsky that there had been vigorous enforcement of that statute in the past, except where it was violated by law enforcement personnel (no surprise there). There is a similar statute here in Oregon, and a former prosecutor that I was hiring as an attorney told me that that law is strictly enforced in Oregon, and he had successfully prosecuted several such cases himself. We've had this law for quite a while, so I assume it's survived the appeal process in the state Appelate & Supreme Courts.

This makes perfect sense, because District Attorneys are elected officials. They will do whatever makes a good impression with the public. Posturing as protecting the privacy of citizens by going after those who make any sort of illegal recording is a good political tactic for a DA seeking reelection.

177 posted on 10/23/2002 12:18:20 AM PDT by Vigilant1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson