Skip to comments.
The American sublime: Jaded art world gasps in amazement at American Christian landscape painters
WORLD ^
| 10/26/02
| Gene Edward Veith
Posted on 10/18/2002 3:18:25 PM PDT by rhema
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: Revolting cat!
I have to be in the right mood for HRS landscapes. You are right that they are dramatic, and a steady diet of them would probably be a bit overwhelming. But a little drama is sometimes a good thing!
If you prefer a little more modern landscape, here's N.C. Wyeth:
Or Winslow Homer, who may be my alltime favorite landscape artist (and Civil War artist-correspondent):
To: Revolting cat!
Oh, I almost forgot . . . I hate Kincaid, but he's different from this crowd. His technical facility is all surface and no depth. . . . as one of Kipling's characters said in one of his stories, "the picture goes no deeper than the paint."
To: AnAmericanMother; rhema
If you like Durand's Niagra you should see Fredrick Church's painting of the view of the Canadian Side.
Rhema, thanks for posting this article. bump up...
To: LibKill
From askart.com
by Regis Francois Gignoux
24
posted on
10/18/2002 5:09:29 PM PDT
by
piasa
To: LibKill
Another from askart.com
Robert Havell, Jr
25
posted on
10/18/2002 5:13:34 PM PDT
by
piasa
To: AnAmericanMother
by George Inness
26
posted on
10/18/2002 5:15:18 PM PDT
by
piasa
To: Pete from Shawnee Mission
Ask and ye shall receive:
To: rhema
And now... for something really different...
by Homer Dodge Martin
28
posted on
10/18/2002 5:17:01 PM PDT
by
piasa
To: AnAmericanMother
by William Trost Richards
29
posted on
10/18/2002 5:19:24 PM PDT
by
piasa
To: piasa
by Sontag, an Ohioan
30
posted on
10/18/2002 5:22:38 PM PDT
by
piasa
Comment #31 Removed by Moderator
To: Paul Atreides
Is it going to far to suggest that if a person claims to like Picasso, you know you're dealing with a first-class phoney?
Thank you, folks, you have regaled my sagging soul.
33
posted on
10/18/2002 5:31:49 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
To: MHGinTN
Some of them do have a way of doing that, don't they? There are a few modern-day artists who can do so as well- I've run into a few while doing shows. But they don't get all those NEA grants like the tasteless 'shock' artists do.
34
posted on
10/18/2002 5:37:55 PM PDT
by
piasa
To: 537 Votes
Not a bit. Especially, when the person launches into a litany of the reasons why they consider Picasso, and all modern art, so important.
To: MHGinTN
Never say sag. Go here for a whole lot of Hudson School paintings:
click
36
posted on
10/18/2002 6:26:35 PM PDT
by
xJones
To: rhema
To: Paul Atreides
So by your sorry logic, anyone who likes art that YOU DON'T LIKE is a first class phony? Who are you to judge the sincerity of other people's tastes?
To: macamadamia
I didn't bring my personal opinions into it. There are just some constants in life. One example is that Yoko Ono is no singer. Getting up and screeching is not equal to singing. By that virtue, a bunch of slash marks on a canvas aren't art. If that is what you like, more power to you, but I don't want to hear from any modernists, and being an artist myself, I have heard what a lot of them have had to say, looking down their pretentious noses at the works spoken of in this article. I have taken a course in modern art, and it has one major philosophy: an utter contempt for the art of the past.
To: Paul Atreides
Picasso was, IMNSHO, primarily a con man. His early Academy style work shows a mild technical facility, nothing more. Any art student worth his salt could have done as well.
I am inherently suspicious of folks who can't handle basic drawing skills and thereafter turn to "interpretive" or "abstract" art. Jackson Pollock, a truly awful painter when he tried realism, is a prime example. He was still an awful painter while dripping globs of pigment on huge canvases, but it was harder to tell. :-D
Just to make everybody mad, though, I'll point out that Cole couldn't draw the human figure very well. His people are stiff, conventional to his period (women with big eyes and tiny pointed feet) and not quite anatomically correct. But his landscapes are marvellous.
For somebody of the period who could handle both landscapes and the human figure, may I offer William Sidney Mount?
The Farmers' Nooning
The Power of Music
He was really a Long Island painter rather than HRS, but about the same period or a trifle later (1830s).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson