Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rdb3; Nix 2
I think your hypothetical assumes that Nix 2 did not intend to hit you. If he did intend to hit you, he is to blame.
135 posted on 10/20/2002 4:21:18 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides; Nix 2
I think your hypothetical assumes that Nix 2 did not intend to hit you. If he did intend to hit you, he is to blame.

Oh, really? So in the fight, Nix 2 is going to cease his aggression agaist you momentarily to ensure that I'm not hit, even though I was the one who got too close Also, wouldn't you use that stoppage of his aggression to your advantage and pounce on him while he's distracted?

The point is, if I had not run up and put myself into that position, my jaw wouldn't be hurting. It's my fault, therefore. Also, in this scenario, I could have cost Nix 2 the fight.

Cause. Effect.

141 posted on 10/20/2002 4:29:04 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson