I dont' mind saying this...I would like to see all animals equiped with guns when a hunter comes along to try to kill it. It would almost be fair. You got a problem with that? You don't like eqaul playing fields?
I don't like equal playing fields even in war.
How far back do you want to go in the banning of hunting equipment? Bows and arrows? Thrown spears? A stone hand-axe? A thrown rock?
So, remember, when you next go out to the wilds to kill an animal to make your clothes, to fill your belly, to get the materials that you need to survive ... you are allowed to use only your hands to make the kill.
Nope. I *prefer* to have the advantage. That's why I like to argue with you.
You really are a class A watermelon aren't you?
If we should find bears with guns; hunters will start using attack helicopters.
The animals have senses FAR beyond human norm and toe to toe most prey could easily kill unarmed humans.
It's already fair. That is why its called hunting, and not raising game for food.
The game animals are in their own environment, they know the territory, they are equipped with excellent senses in order to survive the harshness of their environment.
Here comes a hunter, who would be lucky to catch something. One wrong move, and the game is gone, far away, and the hunter it going to have to try again another time.
I think you should go and convince ranchers that the cattle they raise should be given fully-automatic weapons so that the cattle can revolt against the ranchers.
Hunters and fishermen have contributed more into preserving and maintaining wildlife habitat than all of the environmentalist groups combined, by a very wide margin. And hunters and fishermen are not afraid to share with other non-hunters and non-fishermen the serenity and opportunity to enjoy the great outdoors, unlike environmentalists groups, which are the ones that seek to lock up huge swaths of land away from humans.