Replies

This is not "feminism" by a long shot.

I'm a feminist and I'm pro-Life and totally against anonymous pro-creation (either egg or sperm donation). The man who donated the sperm is equally at fault for participating in an anonymous procreation. He is equally callous toward the child co-created with his sperm. Both parties, IMO, are selfish and less than caring of the intersests of the child.

This is not "feminism" by a long shot. I'm a feminist and I'm pro-Life and totally against anonymous pro-creation (either egg or sperm donation). The man who donated the sperm is equally at fault for participating in an anonymous procreation. He is equally callous toward the child co-created with his sperm. Both parties, IMO, are selfish and less than caring of the intersests of the child.

Oh, my dear, I beg to differ. This is the essence of contemporary feminism - getting a piece of the power pie. The Women's Liberation Movement has devolved into a middle class power and money structure intent on satisfying its own urges at the expense of... well, anyone who stands in the way. Feminism at it is configured today exploits human reproduction - coming and going! - and treats children as so much merchandise. I'm frankly surprised that this woman took the time to bear her own child, what with the risks ro her own health and the consequences for her own figure. Still, $150.00 is cheaper than paying up to $150,000.00 for a premium white infant on the adoption market. Ah, the tradeoffs of modern life...