Skip to comments.
The Bible as 'hate literature' Canadians advance bill hate crimes (Is America Next?)
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| October 21, 2002
| Art Moore
Posted on 10/20/2002 10:16:33 PM PDT by USA21
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: Wrigley
You might not be able to answer here, but just what the hell is a 'bling bling boy'? I have no idea--and I don't even want to try to guess. I was grossed out enough when someone told me what "JOTO" means.
{Hint, two of the four words are "jerk" and "others"}
61
posted on
10/21/2002 9:53:52 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: USA21
A prison sentence for quoting the Bible in Canada? Holy Scriptures treated as "hate literature"? In the end times, which appear to be upon us, the Bible says "woe to those who call evil good, and good evil."
Christ already has their number and a one way bus ticket to eternal damnation waiting for them.
This is the work of the anti-Christ movement. Canadians may be the first nation to recieve the 666 as prophasized.
To: USA21
But homosexual activists contend such a distinction cannot be made with homosexuals any more than it can with matters of race or ethnic origin. Race and ethnic origin are givin at conception. It is not a choice.
Sodomy is a fetish. Nothing more. Some like doing it with animals, knots in trees, and anything above the temperature of liquid nitrogen. They chose a perverted deathstyle. Why give them special rights for having weird sex? Who'll be next? Those who have sex with cars? Stones? worms? Electric cords, paper clips, and a goat on a leash?
To: SkyPilot
Fortunatly your hints didn't help me on the JOTO.
64
posted on
10/21/2002 10:27:53 AM PDT
by
Wrigley
Comment #65 Removed by Moderator
Comment #66 Removed by Moderator
To: USA21
I think it should be obvious what is going on here.
The militant homosexuals have an agenda(same sex marriage, adoption, the "normalization" of pedophilia, etc). The only thing that is keeping them from realizing their sick, warped dream are people who are willing to stand up and say, NO!
This bill is designed to get those people out of the way.
Could you imagine Barney Frank doing the same thing in this country?
67
posted on
10/21/2002 1:51:17 PM PDT
by
Houmatt
To: USA21
I HATE CANADA!
To: NWU Army ROTC
My Bible and my gun from my cold dead hands!
69
posted on
10/21/2002 4:02:20 PM PDT
by
bulldogs
To: Anij
Tell me something, Anij: How did the PC leftists come to be in control in Canada? Is there even a prayer that they would be voted out of power? Or, is the elctoral process there completely corrupted? From what I've read about PC control over all aspects of life there, I'm beginning to wonder if organized armed resistance is the only remaining option for decent people there. Is it really that bad?
To: USA21
Pretty scary stuff
To: Emmylou
[The argument that "skin color is an innate condition" didn't matter one iota in Jim Crow South. In fact, it's a relatively new argument, used by people who know that discrimination against race is wrong but who still want to discriminate on sexual orientation. The argument also carries an implicit air of superiority. By saying you can't discriminate racially because people can't change their skin color implies that certain people "can't help" their condition, as if they should change the color of their skin if it was possible to do. ]
I can't and won't presume to answer for others, but the color of a person's skin is not of their doing. They have no choice, God did that. For me, I don't think anyone should try to change their skin color. It is a non-issue. The color of your skin is neither a matter of shame nor pride, it is nothing over which you have control.
The same is not true for your actions. Those are your choice.
It is not a matter of superiority or "Jim Crow". It is just a matter of my right to believe something is wrong and the right to say it.
72
posted on
10/21/2002 6:37:48 PM PDT
by
nanny
To: Bogolyubski
Re: your questions about the political processes in Canada.
I'm sorry Bogolybski, but I'm afraid I'm the wrong person to ask. I've been a Christian Missionary for nearly 30 years now, and the ONLY government I have *ever* voted for is "Thy Kingdom Come."
I find it impossible to *pray* for GOD'S Government, and then to *vote* for man's. To me this is a dichotomy.
I do pay some attention though, since I must live *under* these Governments until Christ returns. However, I don't pay sufficient attention to answer your questions with the insight they deserve.
I will say however, that from my experience I have come to view ALL "electoral processes" on this earth as "completely corrupted." Politicians are puppets only, and minor players in a really much bigger "game." - Anij.
73
posted on
10/21/2002 7:33:01 PM PDT
by
Anij
To: hunter112
I don't have much use for anti-gay stuff from the BibleFascinating...do you have any use for any of that other Bible stuff?
74
posted on
10/21/2002 7:48:32 PM PDT
by
lsee
To: Anij
Why would the U.S. be any different than Canada if the U.S. passed the same laws? That's a silly question.
75
posted on
10/21/2002 8:00:46 PM PDT
by
A6M3
To: maestro
Thanks for the heads up!
To: JEvanse6
I agree Faggotry and Buggery are disgusting abnormalities, a type of mental illness needing agressive treatment. You have to feel sorry for a man who would make love to another man's rear end. People with this severe disorder need help, not affirmation in their digusting habits.
To: lsee
Fascinating...do you have any use for any of that other Bible stuff? Not really, I consider it about 10% history, 20% philosophy, 30% fantasy, and 40% vague stuff that has been interpreted 1000 different ways, hence, that many denominations from the different versions of basically the same literary work. I've heard some people even think that a large guy in a white robe, with a long white beard actually made a quill pen appear from out of the sky, and wrote it all down on paper. Of course, I learned in Religion 101, that all of it is from oral traditions that finally were set down on some sort of writing material many, many years after the events were supposed to have happened. And later, other people without a clue, or a way to get one, fought over which parts of it to include, and which parts to exclude. Then, it was translated a few times, picking up nuances along the way, and even in the English language, there are many versions of it, depending on who was holding the lever on the printing press.
So, while I have trouble taking passages like, "Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence" (1 Tim 2:11-12) seriously, I realize that all is subject to current interpretation. I expect that before very long, someone will interpret away all of the anti-gay stuff, when it no longer shocks people to find that there are homosexual people in the world.
To: A6M3
My question is no more "silly" than the situation, IMHO. ;) - Anij.
79
posted on
10/22/2002 4:38:00 AM PDT
by
Anij
Comment #80 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson