Replies

Well, I don't think that it was his fault. The bubble would have burst regardless of who won in 2000. But the electorate has a habit of blaming whoever was in charge at the time. As for me, I'll watch the economy and Bush's policies and make a decision based on how I feel he's done. But I'm just me, not the rest of the voters out there. And if the economy doesn't show improvement by 2004 then Bush will no doubt hang for it like his father before him.

But the electorate has a habit of blaming whoever was in charge at the time.

And let me explain why that is. That is due to the simple fact that conservatives aren’t vocal and proactive. We sit by idly and we don’t preemptively engage the propaganda pumped out by the DNC on a daily basis. As a consequence, we allow the repetitive lies to become accepted truths. Democrats stick to their script, they make sure they get their script out their, and that is what it all comes down to in my opinion.

"...Bush will no doubt hang for it like his father before him."

Ross Perot took something like 19% of the vote. I’d say that was because Bush’s father broke his promise on taxes and he made his base angry. God help the fools that cast their vote for Clinton (43%) simply because Clinton ran on the motto: it’s the economy, stupid!