Skip to comments.
Powerful Attack Cripples Internet
Fox News ^
| 10.23.02
Posted on 10/22/2002 10:48:47 PM PDT by Enemy Of The State
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:35:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: jdogbearhunter
thanks for the ping.
To: Enemy Of The State
"This is only a test..."
62
posted on
10/23/2002 6:07:00 AM PDT
by
ncpastor
To: Enemy Of The State
I wondered why my machine was so slow with FR on Monday. I actually got some work done.
To: Enemy Of The State
That which doesn't kill us makes us stronger.
64
posted on
10/23/2002 6:24:15 AM PDT
by
elfman2
To: Tijeras_Slim
I wondered why my machine was so slow with FR on Monday. This attack had no efffect on your connection to FR. Once you first connected, your computer would have cached the numeric IP address and used it without using the DNS servers that were under attack.
To: wirestripper
It's best if your computer looks like a black hole from the net.
A wireless 802.11x network is easy to setup. I would strongly recommend using only Orinoco Gold cards. Use 128 bit encryption. If you use Windows 2000 or XP, setup users with permissions and passwords for everything. You can make it boot and log-on automatically so you don't have to enter anything to access your own network. It makes it much more difficult for outsiders to get in.
I use a Win2k computer for an Internet server (and a music server). I use a program called WinGate to provide Internet sharing and firewall. Wingate allows me to share Internet access on two separate networks, a wired one and a wireless one. I've configured it so the wired and wireless networks are isolated from each other with different IP ranges yet can still share Internet access. This keeps the wireless computers from infecting my wired work network.
66
posted on
10/23/2002 6:28:37 AM PDT
by
DB
To: OXENinFLA
What did they do? Push a button? They enabled a filter on their firewall to block the incoming flood of data. It was easily distinguishable from "legitimate" requests.
To: Enemy Of The State
The FBI and White House were investigating Interesting. Is this what Linda Franklin, victim of murder in Falls Church last week, was working on?
68
posted on
10/23/2002 6:36:51 AM PDT
by
twigs
To: DB
Thanks for the info!
To: self_evident
"Fox is well on their way to tabloidism"...they have been there for a while, IMHO.
To: Jeff Chandler
Actually you can defend against DOS attack by controlling or redirecting the flow of packets. Its pretty simple...just have to catch it in time.
Comment #72 Removed by Moderator
To: Enemy Of The State
I noticed it too, and net performance
today is still suffering.
--Boris
73
posted on
10/23/2002 7:03:35 AM PDT
by
boris
To: kinghorse
Since most don't have a clue, this type of exploit would in fact cripple the internet. It depends on how one defines "cripple." IMHO, it would get rid of all the noise/traffic of those who can't navigate their way around without DNS mapping. For me, that would be a good thing. ;-)
74
posted on
10/23/2002 7:12:18 AM PDT
by
ELS
To: Enemy Of The State
I did notice something in fact. The net really slowed down to a crawl and then no service for a while. This is very unusual for my ISP/DSL.
To: Enemy Of The State
To: John Lenin
Hahahahaha - that's really hilarious!
To: wirestripper
Will a call zapper help? I keep seeing them advertised. I've got a friend who apparently buys every gadget he sees advertised on TV. He says don't waste your money on this one. Worthless. Caller ID does a better job. If you don't recognize the number, don't answer. Or better yet, if it's a telemarketer, answer the phone then tell them "Put me on your "do not call" list." Those are the magic words in the telemarketing industry. By law, telemarketers must NOT call you back after you've uttered those words or they can be fined up to something like $10,000 per offense if they do.
To: Enemy Of The State
This is a crap headline. The internet was
not crippled. Headline should read "Internet infrastructure survives large scale attack."
Due to the distributed/cached nature of the DNS, the root servers would have to be offline for a LONG time for average users to notice.
79
posted on
10/23/2002 7:38:39 AM PDT
by
mikenola
To: Mitchell
re: Maybe it's related, maybe it's not.
taking a decisive stand there eh?
80
posted on
10/23/2002 7:41:12 AM PDT
by
isom35
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson