To: Peach
All seems quiet since yesterday's news the shooter may target children specifically. There is an article posted (sorry I don't know how to link), but a 9 yr old was wounded at a football practice in Penn. Any ideas why we are not hearing about this? Why is not being considered as related?
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
This is the work of the Palestinians, even if it is found out to be the French guy, the Palys put him up to it and maybe even Saddam will pay the perps family.
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
There were four or five shots involved in the Pennsylvania shooting, far outside the only MO we really have as it relates to the Beltway Shooter. Also, the child was "only" grazed at the waist.
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Was the nine year old shot? Perhaps if he was unfortunately shot, police know who did it and it's not related to the sniper? Just don't know the answers.
56 posted on
10/23/2002 3:37:30 AM PDT by
Peach
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
The latest was that they think it was some kids in the woods with pellet guns. A accidental sort of thing. The kids skin was just bruised/scratched. It did not penetrate.
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
9 yr old was wounded at a football practice in Penn. Not our perp. Multiple shots fired, only one round hit causing very minor injury. Not the MO of the MD creep, who fires only once and hits his target hard each time.
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Because of a number of reasons, including the fact that there was more than one gunshot, the calibre was different (actually, the police think it was a bb or pellet gun), the kid was hit in the hip and not a more vital spot, and the police have witnesses who have given them the impression that some kids were in the woods shooting at targets and that it may have merely been an accident that a shot hit the kid.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson