To: flamefront; Neil E. Wright
IF this is proven, it would be plenty to go to war on, IMHO. Much sounder than Bush's statements so far. However, it appears that dubya is COMMITTED to war, no matter what and may be looking into this as cover for what he intends all along. Which is quite scary....
5 posted on
10/23/2002 2:01:22 PM PDT by
dcwusmc
To: dcwusmc
However, it appears that dubya is COMMITTED to war, no matter what Baloney.
To: dcwusmc
In all likelihood, the Bush Administration has sufficient evidence right now to make a case against Saddam and involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing. But to reveal what they already know would most probably also be a scathing indictment of the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001", not merely of incompetence, but of some active enabling of the means to deliver the bomb to the location where it was detonated. And that the Bush Administration will not do. They are leaving this to be determined by historians studying documents that had been kept from public view, a hundred years from now. Even today, we cannot find out what was in many of the documents connected with the Kennedy assassination, which happened almost 39 years ago.
To: dcwusmc
your tin foil hat needs adjusting
33 posted on
10/23/2002 3:35:51 PM PDT by
Endeavor
To: dcwusmc
bump
53 posted on
10/23/2002 8:54:44 PM PDT by
timestax
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson