Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
He was apprehended by the Border Patrol in Bellingham, Wash., in December 2001,

Probably he was fingerprinted in that apprehension, which is what led to his identification in the Montgomery, AL case.

Note that the Montgomery police in all likelihood ran their single fingerprint sample against local and FBI databases, and they came up empty.

Yet when the Feds ran the print, they identified Malvo.

My guess is that the Feds (the sniper task force) gained access to the INS fingerprint database, and used it, while the local Montgomery, AL police had no access to INS fingerprint records.

I suppose that INS fingerprint records are not normally shared with the FBI or any other national fingerprint system, due to "privacy" concerns.

How utterly disgusting.

187 posted on 10/25/2002 7:44:30 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: angkor
How utterly disgusting.

Check this out...


Suspect left danger signs in Bellingham
(FBI had Terror Tip on Sniper
Muhammad, October, 2001!)



188 posted on 10/25/2002 7:50:35 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

To: angkor
"I suppose that INS fingerprint records are not normally shared with the FBI or any other national fingerprint system, due to "privacy" concerns."

You are correct. The the INS fingerprint system (IDENT) is not linked to the FBI or any other database. Not so much due to privacy concerns. More due to stupidity.
194 posted on 10/25/2002 9:00:47 PM PDT by greggery_peccary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson