Replies

From Daily Oklahoman's Diana Baldwin, Judy Kuhlman

Davis, testifying for the third time, said she has refused to name her sources.

A reasonable person could conclude that Jayna Davis told Diana Baldwin and/or Judy Kuhlman that she refused to name her sources.

---------------------------------------------------

From Nancie:

The witnesses voluntarily gave their names to the DAs office and the Grand Jury along with a notarized statement outlining what they knew

A reasonable person could conclude that Jayna Davis told Nancie Drew that she named her sources to the Grand Jury.

-------------------------------------------------------

Nancie, I have never questioned your integritity or your sincerity and I am not going to start now. Having said that, do you see a pattern emerging here relative to our past correspondence? I do.

Honway,

I am very offended by what you are implying in your statement about Jayna Davis. You probably know that it really sets me off for people to question her truthfulness. I know there are a lot of Cate McCauley’s out there who are trying to ruin her reputation. I would be very disappointed in you if that is your motive. I have felt that you were sincere in wanting the truth to come out. I even thought that maybe you had lost someone in the bombing or had some other close ties since you are obviously very interested in this issue.

I am going to assume your motive is for the truth to come out. I can make the statements in this thread because I have been intimately involved in this investigation since almost the beginning (1995). I have met almost every one of Jayna’s witnesses. I have read the letters that came from the DA’s office to Jayna and her lawyer, and have read the letters that Jayna sent to the DA’s office. I am not just a mouthpiece for Jayna. I can post information which I know about personally. There is a lot more that I could say which would show an even greater level of involvement in this whole process, but this is all I am going to reveal to you. I am not really sure what you are questioning. Jayna did not give up her reporter privilege to protect her witnesses, if that is what you are implying. When she was subpoenaed to testify, she did not have to be compelled to give these names to the Grand Jury if the witnesses voluntarily gave their names to the Grand Jury. Actually, your statement is not logical, so I am not sure what you are asking but I do not like what you seem to be implying. Jayna sure was not going to broadcast to the world that these witnesses had asked to testify. If the Grand Jury had called them, their identities needed to be protected. (I get very upset when people put the witness names in public forums. Maybe people think that if the name is out there, it will give the witnesses safety. I happen to disagree with that thinking. Some of the witnesses have voluntarily come forward or were compelled to in the trials and that is a different story).

Jayna has spoken out on many radio programs all over the country. I have been able to hear most of those, by either being at her home when she did them or listening to a tape of the program. A lot of information is coming out that you may not have access to. I have the advantage of knowing what she is saying publicly.

By the way, what is your interest in this story? Did you lose someone close to you?