Replies

Exactly. I have read this and I think it is a reasonable argument for those who wish to be reasonable.

You will never convince the sceptics of either camp. Some will never admit the possibility of the ossuary being genuine. Some for religious reasons....Judaism, for example, will swallow a cow before it admits to the historicity of Jesus. They will never admit to His resurrection, of course.

Protestants, in general, will never admit to the virginity of Mary. It isn't necessary to require the view that Jesus and James shared Mary as blood-mother. It makes sense the way Protestants read the scripture. But it isn't conclusive.

There is something to be said for the notion that she couldn't morally permit herself to have children by two different fathers while both fathers were still living.

Surely when you say "Protestants, in general, will never admit to the virginity of Mary" you mean Protestants will never admit to the perpetual virginity of Mary. I've asked before on other related threads and I'll ask again...why are two different Greek words used for brother and cousin, and why is the same Greek word for brother used in the passage about Jesus as is used in the passage about Peter and Andrew?

It is certainly silly and impudent for anyone to argue against the historicity of Jesus. Secular proofs of His existence abound, including the writings of the Flavius (?) Josephus, the Roman general who was a Jewish contemporary of Jesus from the Holy Land (and not a Christian) who referred to the crucifixion of Jesus in his secular historical treatise.

Nero was in the early 60's persecuting the Christians at Rome and, according to tradition, crucifying Peter upside down at a garden party, illuminated by the burning tar-and-pitch wrapped bodies of living Christians used as torches.

May I say on behalf of Catholics and those Christians non-Catholic, that anyone claiming the historical non-existence of Jesus, in addition to being a personal carnival of promiscuous theological errors, would also have to be a total ignoramus on the subject or an absolute liar? For once, we all ought to be able to agree on that particular aspect of Christianity and truth.