Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So Dak More Registered Voters Than Population??
Myself ^ | 10/6/2002 | Myself

Posted on 11/06/2002 8:30:14 PM PST by nothingnew

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Senator Pardek
Actually, it is "oh, MANNnnnn!"
61 posted on 11/06/2002 10:25:27 PM PST by LurkerNoMore!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Yeah. Don't they have any kids?
62 posted on 11/06/2002 10:25:32 PM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: abner
Thanks for the phone number. I will give them a call.
63 posted on 11/06/2002 10:27:06 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
On a search I got census figures for SD (2001): Total 756600. There sure are a lot of registered voters. Someone should definitely look deeper here! Think I will try to find # of children etc.
64 posted on 11/06/2002 10:36:26 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
Damn, those are percentages that would make the Soviets proud.
65 posted on 11/06/2002 10:45:42 PM PST by PLMerite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
An editorial on Opionion Journal, tonight, mentioned that Johnson was behind until an extra 500 votes were found from an Indian reservation, which gave him a small edge.

I don't know the the writer was speaking figuratively or not, because that is how Tiny Tom won his first election to congress.
66 posted on 11/06/2002 10:49:51 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

COUNTY	Precincts	Total Prec	Turnout	Reg Voters	% Turnout	% for J

BONHOMME	5	5	3445	4572	75.3	92
SHANNON	10	10	3120	6990	44.6	92
TODD	9	9	2529	4884	51.8	81
BUFFALO	4	4	803	1123	71.5	80
DEWEY	15	15	2341	4129	56.7	73
ZIEBACH	8	8	987	1606	61.5	66
CLAY	13	13	5283	9069	58.3	66
DAY	14	14	3437	4200	81.8	64
MOODY	6	6	3155	4248	74.3	62
CORSON	17	17	1610	2569	62.7	62
MARSHALL	12	12	2196	2926	75.1	61
MINER	8	8	1437	1915	75	61
JERAULD	6	6	1303	1633	79.8	60
ROBERTS	14	14	4481	6377	70.3	60
DEUEL	11	11	2212	2963	74.7	58
LAKE	18	18	5545	7628	72.7	58
SPINK	10	10	3633	4634	78.4	57
LYMAN	7	7	1976	2580	76.6	57
BROWN	22	22	17304	22773	76	57
KINGSBURY	6	6	3048	4121	74	56
SANBORN	7	7	1430	1974	72.4	56
BENNETT	9	9	1643	2369	69.4	56
CLARK	15	15	2263	2861	79.1	55
AURORA	7	7	1604	2052	78.2	55
BEADLE	21	21	8034	11321	71	55
BROOKINGS	15	15	11492	16962	67.8	54
MELLETTE	4	4	912	1416	64.4	54
GRANT	20	20	3903	5184	75.3	53
BRULE	5	5	2518	3396	74.1	53
CHARLES MIX	13	13	4348	5726	75.9	52
MINNEHAHA	72	72	65813	87865	74.9	52
YANKTON	15	15	9306	13051	71.3	52
HAND	12	12	2393	3024	79.1	51
EDMUNDS	7	7	2322	3040	76.4	51
MCCOOK	6	6	3010	3972	75.8	50
CODINGTON	33	33	11489	15880	72.3	50
HAMLIN	12	12	2931	3772	77.7	49
DAVISON	21	21	7994	10545	75.8	49
TURNER	8	8	4320	5861	73.7	48
UNION	13	13	5371	8450	63.6	48
GREGORY	3	3	2398	3410	70.3	47
JACKSON	8	8	1202	1880	63.9	47
FAULK	11	11	1391	1779	78.2	46
LINCOLN	22	22	12671	16366	77.4	45
STANLEY	8	8	1492	1977	75.5	45
TRIPP	13	13	3071	4032	76.2	44
POTTER	8	8	1616	2060	78.4	43
HUGHES	18	18	8434	10866	77.6	43
HANSON	7	7	1872	2527	74.1	43
HUTCHINSON	10	10	4024	5638	71.4	43
WALWORTH	15	15	2740	4146	66.1	43
HYDE	5	5	915	1222	74.9	42
FALLRIVER	17	17	3110	4960	62.7	40
SULLY	6	6	946	1174	80.6	39
LAWRENCE	11	11	9806	13654	71.8	38
CAMPBELL	5	5	978	1412	69.3	38
PENNINGTON	41	41	36131	55299	65.3	38
MCPHERSON	6	6	1626	2164	75.1	36
PERKINS	10	10	1662	2312	71.9	35
CUSTER	10	10	3710	5155	72	34
MEADE	38	38	9103	13251	68.7	34
BUTTE	16	16	3670	5177	70.9	33
DOUGLAS	5	5	1897	2375	79.9	32
JONES	5	5	746	882	84.6	28
HAAKON	6	6	1228	1655	74.2	28
HARDING	10	10	801	955	83.9	21

STATEWIDE	844	844	340181	475989	71.5

It's not very pretty, but it should be easy to cut and paste straight into an excel spreadsheet if you want to look at the data yourself...

67 posted on 11/06/2002 10:51:12 PM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Census data show SD under age 18 at 26.8% in 2000. National average is 25% under age 18. Population age 65 and over was 14.3% in 2000: National Average for over 65 is 12.4%. Have to go back now and check table on this thread.
68 posted on 11/06/2002 10:51:42 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: itsnevertoolate

Doh! Never cut, paste and sort after a couple of beers.Sorry!

69 posted on 11/06/2002 11:04:35 PM PST by evolved_rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
I'm kind of impatient with this thread. Does anyone have a thesis? Anyone care to give us a summation?

If so, here are the ways to FREEPING:

http://www.fec.gov/
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/voting/misc/contact.htm

If you want to clearly STATE THE CASE, I'll provide more definitive information about who to contact....

Arlen
http://www.unspun.info
70 posted on 11/06/2002 11:36:41 PM PST by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
I'm kind of impatient with this thread. Does anyone have a thesis? Anyone care to give us a summation?

If so, here are the ways to FREEPING:

http://www.fec.gov/
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/voting/misc/contact.htm

If you want to clearly STATE THE CASE, I'll provide more definitive information about who to contact....

Arlen
http://www.unspun.info
71 posted on 11/06/2002 11:36:49 PM PST by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
Motor-voter.
72 posted on 11/07/2002 12:28:01 AM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O; Robert_Paulson2
Based on the numbers posted by nothingnew at #29, the census #'s really indicate some sort of problem, particularly in the following counties.
County # Registered
to vote
Population
(18+ yrs. of Age)
Too Many
Registrations
Turned 18 yrs. old
in 2000
Unexplained by
Post Census
Birthdays
% of Population
Registered
to Vote
Bennett 2369 2273 96 144 104.22%
Campbell 1412 1312 100 52 48 107.62%
Dewey 4129 3649 480 258 222 113.15%
Haakon 1655 1632 23 63 101.41%
Hand 3024 2821 203 102 101 107.20%
Hanson 2527 2213 314 103 211 114.19%
Harding 955 912 43 49 104.71%
Jackson 1880 1861 19 119 101.02%
Jones 882 880 2 35 100.23%
Mellette 1416 1348 68 82 105.04%
Shannon 6990 6831 159 627 102.33%
Sully 1174 1158 16 44 101.38%
Ziebach 1606 1499 107 114 107.14%
= 30019 28389 1630 1792 582

Data has obviously changed somewhat since 2000, but how significantly? Notice the difference between state-wide population figures for 2000 and 2001:

2000: 754,844 per your posts at #14 & #17
2001: 756,600 per Robert_Paulson2 at #15

The state-wide population increase between 2000 and 2001 was 1,756. What sort of change took place during 2002? Regardless, I don't see how it could explain away the numbers in these counties, even if registration was manditory.

73 posted on 11/07/2002 2:10:22 AM PST by InfraRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jdogbearhunter
98% in Shanon went to Johnson?

AND Shannon had the lowest percentage of registered voters turning out, the only county in the state in the 40's, against a state average of over 70 percent turn out.

Smells like a (Thune) ballot bonfire to me. Would this have been doable for the 'Rats? Can we please impound the voter rolls there?

74 posted on 11/07/2002 2:33:03 AM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: evolved_rage
McPherson County 2,904 6 6 3,010 3,972 75.8 137%

Oops. McPherson County 37% more registered voters than population...tsk, tsk.

100 more voters than population. Should be the first batch anybody looks at.

75 posted on 11/07/2002 2:59:51 AM PST by woofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
>>Saddam got 100% a few weeks ago<<

AND his % was so high because all the Iraqis are getting farm aid...

Viewed in this light, SD results make perfect sense.

76 posted on 11/07/2002 3:03:04 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
ping for your interest.
77 posted on 11/07/2002 3:07:20 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
My interest ?...LOL.

THis is a repeat of my post at 3 pm yesterday, on the Thune thread.

78 posted on 11/07/2002 5:02:51 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Ping for followup.
79 posted on 11/07/2002 7:39:50 AM PST by ForGod'sSake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: InfraRed
while I realize SOME folks who were seventeen turned eighteen, I suspect SOME folks died TOO, during that period. I wonder if they were deleted off the registration rolls or if they too were resurrected to "get out the vote"?

Something awry here. WHO is working on this? Thune's crew? Ashcroft? Bush's team? or just Freepers?

Thune may have lost fair and square. I doubt it. Is this the state where the Indian lady was paid by dems to "get out the dead" and was forging signatures on ballot applications?

Seems MORE than a recount is in order.
80 posted on 11/07/2002 8:35:26 AM PST by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson