Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Solution for the Democrats
National Review Online ^ | November 7, 2002 | Dinesh D’Souza

Posted on 11/07/2002 6:36:33 PM PST by John Lenin

November 7, 2002, 8:45 a.m.
A Solution for the Democrats

How to win next time.

By Dinesh D’Souza

These critics are right. The Democrats could improve their political fortunes by unequivocally embracing the three central principles of the political Left: anti-Americanism, economic piracy, and moral degeneracy.

At first glance, this may not seem like a winning political program. But consider: Anti-Americanism is quite a popular notion these days. Lots of people hate America, and some of those people live in America. The anti-Americans blame American foreign policy for causing terrorism and other evils in the world. They detest American capitalism and American culture.

A newly assertive Democratic party could embrace this anti-American vision. It could go beyond opposing President Bush's Iraq policy to opposing all efforts to fight terrorism. Indeed it could declare America itself to be a terrorist country and seek to define all U.S. military action as "state-sponsored terrorism."

How would such a policy be sustained politically? Of course it would not be enough to win the votes of America-haters in this country. It seems that there are many millions of America-haters in other countries, such as France, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Pakistan, and Yemen. The Democrats should encourage America-haters all over the world to become American citizens. Failing this, they should work to loosen eligibility requirements so that anti-American aliens could at least vote for Democratic candidates in presidential elections.

Second, the Democrats should openly advocate the economic looting of one class of citizens in order to benefit another class of citizens. Ordinarily this is called theft, but in politics it is called "redistribution" or better still "compassion." Again, in ordinary language people who are robbed are called "victims," but in politics they are called "greedy" for wanting to hold on to what is theirs.

Now it may seem that the Democratic party has already perfected the art of using the government for the purpose of legal plunder. True, since the New Deal the Democrats have been the party of economic redistribution. By and large, Democrats have shown no interest in how to create a pie; their sole focus has been on how to carve up the pie.

But Democrats in the past few decades have been hampered by the need to seem economically responsible, and thus the party has not embraced the Left-wing program of blatantly seizing citizens' asserts and earnings. Why stop with a measly prescription-drug benefit for the elderly? The Democrats could abandon their past timidity and go for it all: free health care for seniors, unlimited scholarships for anyone who wants to go to college, no time limits on unemployment benefits, no work requirements for welfare, federal subsidies for aspiring artists to produce anti-Bush sculptures and songs, and so on.

This Democratic approach would be based on the political wisdom embodied in George Bernard Shaw's maxim, "Any government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always count on Paul's support." The secret, of course, is to make sure that the beneficiaries of this state-sponsored robbery (potential Democratic voters) outnumber those who are robbed (potential Republican voters).

Finally, the Democrats could become the party of moral degeneracy. In recent years the Democrats have not embraced moral degeneracy outright. They have contented themselves with hiding behind the slogan of "liberty." If accused of encouraging pornography, the Democrats have said, "No, we are for liberty of expression." Charged with supporting abortion-on-demand, the Democrats insist, "No, we are the party that gives women freedom over their own bodies." Caught distributing sex kits and homosexual instruction manuals to young people, the Democrats protest, "We are merely attempting to give people autonomy and freedom of choice."

But what is the need for this coyness? The Democrats should stop hiding behind "freedom of choice" and become blatant advocates for divorce, illegitimacy, adultery, homosexuality, bestiality, and pornography. Indeed the Democrats could become the Party of the Seven Deadly Sins. The political advantage of this approach is that the Seven Deadly Sins are immensely popular. Imagine the political opportunities if all vices were associated with the Democratic party!

Yes, right now President Bush and the Republicans are riding high. But just wait until 2004, when the party of fighting terrorism, promoting economic growth, and fostering traditional moral values, meets its match in a party that stands for anti-Americanism, economic plunder, and moral degeneracy.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: John Lenin
bookmark bump.
41 posted on 11/07/2002 8:05:50 PM PST by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
Dinesh D'Souza's sarcasm is lost on the opposition party. They take things literally so I'm hopeful they'll follow this well-meaning advice and also take in stride Ann Coulter's recommendation to rename themselves The Abortion Party with unbridled enthusiasm. Once the dust has settled we'll see how many of them are still around. Looks like the Democrats want to go the way of The Whigs and even while they're in the process of self-destructing, its wise for us to just sit back and watch it unfold. After all, the enemy is doing a fine job of it all on his own.
42 posted on 11/07/2002 8:14:45 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
If the liberal dems would ease up on taxes and the Second Amendment, most libertarians would embrace the liberal dems like long lost lovers.

Wow! I sped by your post, but when I thought about it a bit more I recognized how very true it is! Congratulations for nailing it! It seems the libertarians might need just a few other items too, but attaining their allegience seems as if it is possible.

FR will lose some of its most intransigent and argumentative posters to DUh if that happens.

43 posted on 11/07/2002 8:55:00 PM PST by AFPhys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
bump
44 posted on 11/07/2002 9:44:46 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
With flags waving, marching backwards...

Maybe the Dems can run McGovern for President again!

45 posted on 11/07/2002 9:47:56 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Fighting to save America and Israel from Islamic terrorism!
46 posted on 11/07/2002 10:06:52 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
My fervent prayer is that the rats DO lurch left. Pelosi for minority leader, rah!

Nam Vet

47 posted on 11/07/2002 10:12:06 PM PST by Nam Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: reformed_democrat
"We just handed the governorship, state house, and state senate to the dems. Also, the Sec of State office, the Attoryney General's office, the Comptroller, and most of the judges also went dem."

Are you from California?

48 posted on 11/08/2002 12:53:30 AM PST by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Neanderthal
Worse -- I'm from the state that lists its major population centers as "Chicago" and "Other."

I live in "Other."

49 posted on 11/08/2002 12:19:38 PM PST by reformed_democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Yeah, I can't wait for Nov. 2004. I just love to see the democrats suffer, they deserve all the pain they get.
50 posted on 11/08/2002 12:48:49 PM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Good read.
51 posted on 11/09/2002 9:17:23 PM PST by Prerunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson