1 posted on
11/09/2002 9:33:47 PM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: kattracks
I say we tell them that we will start using tactic nukes on them if there are any more terrorist attacks...
To: kattracks
Hmmmm .. doesn't sounds good
5 posted on
11/09/2002 9:38:15 PM PST by
Mo1
To: glock rocks
Ping!
8 posted on
11/09/2002 9:41:13 PM PST by
Madcelt
To: kattracks; Mo1
To: kattracks
An important part of Terrorism is creating terror. Once terrorists have attacked the threats of terror work almost as well as a terrorist act.
The rule of terrorism is to first attack then follow with lots of threats of attacks. After an unexpected real attack comes threats of attacks followed by a real attack and then repeat.
They have every reason to not announce the real attacks and contantly announce fake attacks.
To: kattracks
This can't be true, dAshole still thanks Homeland Security is not a priority.
20 posted on
11/09/2002 9:50:52 PM PST by
jdontom
To: kattracks
Local oil refineries have received telephone calls, asking questions for a supposed survey, questioning the comings and goings and security of the refineries. A possible terrorism alert has been issued.
21 posted on
11/09/2002 9:51:20 PM PST by
Eva
To: kattracks
A Pakistani-American businessman who helped negotiate a deal turned down by the Clinton administration for Osama bin Laden's extraditionI don't know how any American ... any human ... can get past this line without GETTING IT. It's Clinton, Clinton, Clinton. Three thousand dead, economy stopped in its tracks, impending war, all because Bubba found the terrorism too boring to deal with.
23 posted on
11/09/2002 9:52:31 PM PST by
Timesink
To: kattracks
In about 3 weeks, Ramadan ends, and our holiday season is in full swing....
To: kattracks
And to think the Dems have been holding up the Homeland Security bill all this time.....
Is there any doubt that the liberals have left us more vulnerable to terrorists attacks?
Bastards.
26 posted on
11/09/2002 9:54:25 PM PST by
Jorge
To: kattracks
He also predicted attacks on 11/9 (Saturday). Reverse of 9/11, get it? It's the numerology thing. I don't know how much credibility this guy has. Sometimes I think he's scamming FNC for a few "news consultant" bucks.
To: kattracks
I hope our response is devastating.
To: kattracks
Yawn...
Where was InterPol & Mansoor on September 10, 2001?
Not that I doubt the Muslim hillbillies are gonna eventually attempt something but the melodrama is pretty apparent.
To: kattracks
I missed this tonight.
Chemical
Biological
Nuclear
Which will it be?
To: kattracks
This is why we need to attack Iraq. If we kill the leaders of countries supporting terrorism, then OTHER countries will put a stop to it FOR US- before the same thing happens to them...
59 posted on
11/09/2002 10:44:31 PM PST by
Mr. K
To: kattracks
This is ALSO why we need to stop talking about kicking Iraq's ass without mentioning its connection to terrorists. The move to disarm soddamn hinsane is good, but disarming him so that he doesnt supply terrorists with nukes sounds much much better.
62 posted on
11/09/2002 10:47:07 PM PST by
Mr. K
To: kattracks
"Within the next two to three weeks I think we're going to be looking at something pretty tough."..."We should be worried," Ijaz told "Foxwire" host Rita Cosby. Mansoor Ijaz seems like a straight shooter to me. His words, quoted above, got my attention. If the attack is in the form of biological agents there is not much we as citizens can do. I believe it is justifiable because it is war and a matter of life and death for us as citizens.
Every time there is a threat I would like to see our government wage an unrelenting attack against al Queda strongholds like the major one on the Afghan-Pakistani border southeast of Khabul. In this case I would recommend the use of biological agents against them in the remote areas where they are suspected of hiding.
If these attacks are as major as Ijaz believes them to be those of us who manage to survive will be living a life that is unimaginable by today's standards.
To: kattracks
"Within the next two to three weeks I think we're going to be looking at something pretty tough."..."We should be worried," Ijaz told "Foxwire" host Rita Cosby.CORRECTION: I had added a sentence to the wrong paragraph. It's late and I'm tired.
Mansoor Ijaz seems like a straight shooter to me. His words, quoted above, got my attention. If the attack is in the form of biological agents there is not much we as citizens can do. I believe it is justifiable because it is war and a matter of life and death for us as citizens.
Every time there is a threat I would like to see our government wage an unrelenting attack against al Queda strongholds like the major one on the Afghan-Pakistani border southeast of Khabul. In this case I would recommend the use of biological agents against them in the remote areas where they are suspected of hiding. I believe it is justifiable because it is war and a matter of life and death for us as citizens.
If these attacks are as major as Ijaz believes them to be those of us who manage to survive will be living a life that is unimaginable by today's standards.
To: kattracks
97 posted on
11/10/2002 12:22:34 AM PST by
Dajjal
To: kattracks
Regarding these major upcoming attacks -- this is serious, there are intelligence reports, as Ijaz said.
There are also a few other articles, for those interested.
One from the UK Times, about the UK giving out a nuclear threat warning, then retracting it, so as not to scare people, not because the threat isn't real. The link to that is:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-474530,00.html
And a revealing, and I think mostly true, article at Debka. I know some of you don't care for it, but for those interested, I think it's worth reading: "The Nuclear Threat is Real"
http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=196
"Now the bad news is out in the open: the British public has been told the truth, however inadvertently.
According to DEBKAfiles counter- terror sources, potential alerts registered in the second week of November include:
--- Possible nuclear or chemical attacks in North American, West European and Middle East cities. The alert for London pinpoints The City, government offices, the Underground and the Thames River.
--- In pursuit of massive casualties, terrorists may resort to bomb cars or kamikaze pilots. Ships loaded with many tons of explosives of all types some containing nuclear substances may crash into Western harbors such as London, New York, Tel Aviv or Haifa."
I won't post it separately, but Debka has a couple of articles about our CURRENT battles in Iraq -- just go to their main page:
http://www.debka.com/
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson