Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rye
but also was complicit in both the 9/11 attacks and the subsequent anthrax "warnings."

It's my opinion that Iraq/Saddam was behind the highly refined, never been seen milled so fine anthrax. The reason, I believe, we haven't come out and said so is the proof is so thin and if we said it was them our stated policy on responding to WMD attacks with WMD attacks (all we have in nukes) would require us to Nuke Iraq.

To do it would be, to say the least, counter productive for middle east policy and to not do it and tell the world that we didn't back up our policy is to make the policy moot.

So we are going against Saddam another way and when the rest of the middle east sees Iraq flip to some form of Democracy they will become the 21st century version of the 80s Poland; the brick removed from the wall of tyranny in the middle east that starts to pull down the tyrants of the Arab world.

I believe if Iraq flips then Iran is next and then Jordan and the Emirates would eventually go and then maybe even Saudi Arabia and eventually Syria.

It's a dream but then again Reagan's dream came true.

50 posted on 11/09/2002 10:24:54 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: big ern
Very reasonable analysis, Ern. Our only viable option is the one we're presently taking. Imo, our areas of concentration will be Iraq, then Iran, then No. Korea, and a 'domino effect' of democracy (throughout the Middle East, and possibly parts of Africa and SE Asia) will be the likely result of it.
58 posted on 11/09/2002 10:43:15 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson