Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctors Question Use of Dead Or Dying Patients for Training
The Wall Street Journal ^ | Tuesday, November 12, 2002 | PAUL GLADER

Posted on 11/12/2002 6:41:14 AM PST by TroutStalker

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:47:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Unbeknownst to the vast majority of family members, after a patient dies in the emergency room of many hospitals, a senior physician draws a curtain and supervises young doctors practicing several rounds of emergency medical techniques on the deceased.

In addition, several hospitals permit young doctors to practice on patients who are nearly dead, that is, who are technically still alive, but beyond the help of even extraordinary measures.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 11/12/2002 6:41:14 AM PST by TroutStalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
This was kinda shocking when I first read it but if I was already dead it would be OK with me. Just don't bill my insurance co. for it.
2 posted on 11/12/2002 6:48:10 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Yeah I'd like to think in death, I could give something back. I'm dead...poke away!
3 posted on 11/12/2002 6:52:56 AM PST by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
"Some believe virtual reality, fiber-optic and mannequin technology will continue to improve as an alternative."

Great. I really want to be treated by a physician who trained by playing with dolls.

4 posted on 11/12/2002 6:57:44 AM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
I'm dead...poke away!

well said, as long as we're not talking about a naughty mortician...

5 posted on 11/12/2002 7:00:47 AM PST by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
I had an "attempted hemorrhoidectomy" in a doctor's office on a Friday afternoon.

Everything was fine until Saturday morning, when I had uncontrollable rectal bleeding.

I stuffed a roll of paper towels into my shorts, sat on another and drove to the emergency room. You'd be amazed at how rapidly they admit you if you are (a) holding a blood-soaked roll of Bounty and (b) making a puddle on the floor.

I was hospitalized for six days. During this period, the fellow who committed the botched operation (and was out of town all weekend) brought groups of medical students around to examine my rectum. "You will not likely see many cases like this," he told them. "Acute gangrenous prolapsed hemorrhoid. Could you please spread your cheeks a little more, Mr. Boris?..."

An educational opportunity. At least I lived. Sort of.

--Boris

6 posted on 11/12/2002 7:05:52 AM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
Hmmm. If the patient is not dead doesn't that make it murder? I didn't know that doctors had the legal authority to order a procedure that would kill a patient who is still alive under any circumstances.

Well, I guess this is to be expected. After all if it's okay to murder a baby, why not a terminal patient?

I'm not dead yet!

7 posted on 11/12/2002 7:21:37 AM PST by Seruzawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
During this period, the fellow who committed the botched operation (and was out of town all weekend) brought groups of medical students around to examine my rectum.

And you let him do this with nary a harsh word? It would be different if he was the surgeon who saved you, rather than the one who fouled you from behind (its basketball season).

8 posted on 11/12/2002 7:24:09 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Your are right if you are dead you wouldn't know it but apparently sometimes the person isn't dead. The absolute lease they should do is get permission. If they don't get it, they shouldn't do anything.

It is surprising this hasn't come out in the open sooner. Wouldn't a coroner be able to tell a body has been fiddled with? This is a scandal in my estimation.

9 posted on 11/12/2002 7:25:30 AM PST by blackbart1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
Without written permission or verbal from the family they shouldn't be doing anything other than attempting to save the patient, period.
10 posted on 11/12/2002 7:28:57 AM PST by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
What part of the article said they do things to cause the death? It said they PROLONG life in order to practice after the brain is GONE. Have you ever been with a dying person? It doesn't happen like switching off the lights. The chronically ill slip away in stages. Electrical activity in the heart muscles continues long after blood has ceased to flow. I have used the rubber dummies and animal models in school and nothing compares to the intubation of a human. Endotracheal intubation is one of the most difficult to master parts of resuscitation. It is also the most critical. Without oxygen, you can push drugs and shock away and it won't make a difference. THEY DIE.
11 posted on 11/12/2002 7:32:07 AM PST by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: boris
Stop reading in the toilet.
13 posted on 11/12/2002 7:39:56 AM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blackbart1
As far as the coroner not knowing, of course he knows this goes on. It probably would look like heroic measures were used to try & save the person. If he had died on the table anyway, how could you tell. My next door neighbor is an MD emergency room specalist at a big hospital, I wonder if she would tell me? Probably not.
14 posted on 11/12/2002 7:46:46 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
...a third of the residents said prolonging the life of patients for practice is appropriate and 16% had done so.

Sickening.

15 posted on 11/12/2002 7:58:18 AM PST by LurkerNoMore!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamWallace1999
I agree with Biker's reply in #10. Do you?
16 posted on 11/12/2002 8:00:18 AM PST by LurkerNoMore!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LurkerNoMore!
I worked in a teaching hospital. An elderly stroke patient who is aphasic is a medical lab rat in a teaching hospital. Do not let you or your relatives in this situation be left alone in one of thos facilities. Also you can refuse to have residents and med students follow or be involved in your case. When you are admitted say you want your attending and the chief resident to care for you but do not permeit others to care for you.

Remeber all residents interns and med students walk around with proceedure check list. You could be their next proceedure...or even worse...their first...

17 posted on 11/12/2002 8:12:02 AM PST by mlmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mlmr
Oh, I don't care. If those kids can learn something on me and save a young persons' life, it'll be worth it. Of course, I might think differently should this actually happen to me.

However, I think the trainees would try to be gentle. They are still in the humanitarian phase.
18 posted on 11/12/2002 9:01:50 AM PST by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
I have watched med students practically sitting on an elderly stroke patients chests peering for long minutes at a time at the retinas of these patients. I have literaly had to pull them off of patients. There is some compassion but as I said, these kinds of patients are treated like specimens. And specimens are not treated well.
19 posted on 11/12/2002 9:58:00 AM PST by mlmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LurkerNoMore!
Absolutely agree with the consent issue. It could be incorporated in the mountain of other crap you have to sign at pre-admits. I would raise an additional question for discussion. If one's care is entirely paid for by the state, does one retain the same autonomy of consent. Does a person not have to give anything back to society in return for the best healthcare in the world.
20 posted on 11/12/2002 10:00:02 AM PST by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson