Posted on 11/12/2002 4:49:54 PM PST by RCW2001
JAY LINDSAY, Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, November 12, 2002
©2002 Associated Press
URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/11/12/national1943EST0805.DTL
(11-12) 16:43 PST BOSTON (AP) --
After student complaints, Harvard University said Tuesday it had canceled a reading by an Irish poet who compared U.S.-born settlers in the West Bank to Nazis and said they should be "shot dead."
Tom Paulin, an Oxford University lecturer, was scheduled to appear Thursday as part of the English Department's Morris Gray Lecture series.
But in an e-mail to English majors Tuesday, department chair Lawrence Buell said the reading had been canceled "by mutual consent of the poet and the English Department."
Buell also apologized for the "widespread consternation" the invitation to Paulin had caused. He said Paulin was invited last winter, before his controversial remarks, solely because of his poetic achievements.
Benjamin Solomon-Schwartz, undergraduate president of Harvard Hillel, said he was heartened by the university's decision, adding Paulin's comments crossed the line between opinion and "being inhumane."
In April, Paulin was quoted in the Egyptian newspaper, Al-Ahram Weekly, saying American Jewish settlers should be "shot dead."
"I think they are Nazis, racists, I feel nothing but hatred for them," he said.
In the same interview, Paulin said he understands "how suicide bombers feel," but suggested guerrilla warfare would be more effective because attacks on civilians could create a sense a solidarity.
In his poem "Killed in the Crossfire," he writes of "another little Palestinian boy in trainers jeans and a white teeshirt" killed by the "Zionist SS."
Paulin did not respond to phone messages at Columbia University, where he is teaching this semester, or an e-mail message requesting comment. In April, he told The Daily Telegraph of London in a letter that his views had been distorted.
"I do not support attacks on Israeli civilians under any circumstances," he wrote. "I am in favor of the current efforts to achieve a two-state solution to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians."
©2002 Associated Press
Wrong. Since it's not a public instution it's not a Constitutional issue. But it's still a question of free speech. What Harvard did was legal, but it was still pathetic. If they're going to invite a creep, they should let him speak. Then they should invite pro-Israel speakers, and let them speak.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.