Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alan Chapman
"This issue isn't about gun ownership. It's about wreckless endangerment on the part of a steward or guardian. "

Well I didn't say insane, I said mentally deranged. And many of these people do not have stewards or guardians. If you have doubts just spend some time downtown on the streets of any major city.

Should these people have a right to carry firearms?

102 posted on 11/14/2002 6:38:40 PM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Kerberos
They should have all the same rights that the rest of us have - including the right to the means of self-defense - until such time as they've been adjudicated incompetent to remain free in society.
107 posted on 11/14/2002 7:04:47 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Kerberos
...I didn't say insane, I said mentally deranged.

What's the difference? In either case the people in question are incapable of advocating their own rights.

If you have doubts just spend some time downtown on the streets of any major city. Should these people have a right to carry firearms?

I have to wonder what insane people are doing wandering the streets.

Anyone who lacks sufficient mental capacity to advocate their own rights, or who is incapable of appreciating the consequences of their actions, should not be permitted to have a weapon of any kind let alone a gun. Anyone who gives an insane person a weapon should be charged with a crime.

109 posted on 11/14/2002 7:33:08 PM PST by Alan Chapman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson