Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: m1911
No matter what the conclusion of the doctors at that institution was. No matter the reason for being committed.

Sorry, you're mistaken:

(3) APPLICATION TO PERSONS WHO HAVE BEEN ADJUDICATED AS A MENTAL DEFECTIVE OR COMMITTED TO A MENTAL INSTITUTION-

(A) For purposes of paragraph (1), an adjudication as a mental defective occurs when a court, board, commission, or other government entity determines that a person, as a result of marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease--

(i) is a danger to himself or to others; or

(ii) lacks the mental capacity to contract or manage his own affairs.

(B) The term `adjudicated as a mental defective' includes--

(i) a finding of insanity by a court in a criminal case; and

(ii) a finding that a person is incompetent to stand trial or is not guilty by reason of lack of mental responsibility pursuant to articles 50a and 72b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 850a, 876b).

(C) EXCEPTIONS- This paragraph does not apply to--

(i) a person--

(I) in a mental institution for observation; or

(II) voluntarily committed to a mental institution; or

(ii) information protected by doctor-patient privilege.


90 posted on 11/14/2002 2:40:19 PM PST by mvpel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel
Mmmm, you serve such yummy crow!

That's pretty embarrassing, since I use Thomas a lot and I know better than to jump to conclusions without at least trying to read the bill.

My only (lame) defense is that I assumed (I know, I know) that it used the same definition as 922(g), which is no definition at all.

Mea culpa, mea culpa.
103 posted on 11/14/2002 6:42:55 PM PST by m1911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson