[general_re]

The four "major camps" of young earth creation, ID, gradualism and punctuated equilibria disagree on the interpretation of the available evidence.

And two of those camps, being theological in nature, have real troubles accounting for the available evidence. ;)

[scripter]

Of course, and it would be wrong of me not to point this out, that's just your opinion of their interpretation of the available evidence. :-) As a wise person also once noted: "hostile resistance to inquiry is prima facie cause for inquiry." Not that you're being hostile - not in the least, I just like that quote.

TFFTL!

[gore3000]

And two of those camps, being theological in nature, have real troubles accounting for the available evidence. ;)

Yup, the evolutionists and the punk eekers have a tremendous problem refuting the large amount of Evidence Disproving Evolution. From DNA to the numerous idiosyncracies of so many living things that are totally unexplainable by evolutionary theory as well as the inconsistencies in the theory itself evolution is ready for the dustbin of history.

[RobRoy]

>>And two of those camps, being theological in nature, have real troubles accounting for the available evidence. ;)
<<

No, they don't. They just have real troubles agreeing with the other camps interpretation of the available evidence. 8^>