Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Am I?
Reason Online ^ | 11/01/02 | Reason Online

Posted on 11/15/2002 10:15:09 AM PST by correctthought

I'm a .25 caliber pistol—a so-called Saturday Night Special—made by defunct gun maker Raven Arms. Although I'm an inanimate object, I've been found legally culpable in the 2000 classroom shooting of a West Palm Beach, Florida school teacher.

More specifically, a jury has just found gun distributor Valor 5 percent guilty in the tragic murder, which occurred when a 16-year-old student stole an unloaded version of me and some bullets from a family friend and then killed his teacher. The local school board and the family friend—though not the actual shooter—shouldered the rest of the blame. In the first trial in which a gun company has in any way been held responsible for a murder, Valor is supposed to pay $1.2 million to the victim's widow. The school board is supposed to pay $10.8 million and the family friend $12 million.

The plaintiff's lawyer was Bob Montgomery, best known for representing Florida in its $11.3 billion victory over tobacco companies. The case charged that I was "unsafe, defective and lacked features that would have prevented a minor from using it." Valor's attorneys countered that I wasn't a piece of "junk" and that I had legitimate uses, including self-defense, which is how most guns get used.

All the defendants are appealing the verdict which, given the way municipal cases against gun makers have fared, is likely to be overturned. As the legal battle in Florida moves into the next round, it's worth asking how far we really want to travel down the product-liability road when it comes to guns—and many other things.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; fla; rkba; valorcorp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
More on the ruling from FLA
1 posted on 11/15/2002 10:15:09 AM PST by correctthought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: correctthought
You bad, evil inannimate object, you!
2 posted on 11/15/2002 10:18:16 AM PST by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
What religion is it that believes that spirits live in various objects?
3 posted on 11/15/2002 10:21:07 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
When you grow up and become an adult caliber, let me know.
4 posted on 11/15/2002 10:21:21 AM PST by Gordian Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
"unsafe, defective and lacked features that would have prevented a minor from using it."

Ditto for a whole host of consumer products, including cars, poisons, swimming pools, matches, knives, even McDonald's french fries. The existence of these items does not make them inherently dangerous.

I presume the defense used the word "re-spon-si-bil-i-ty" numerous times.

5 posted on 11/15/2002 10:21:53 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
"What religion is it that believes that spirits live in various objects? "

The Democratic Party

6 posted on 11/15/2002 10:23:08 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
The plaintiff lawyer religion.
7 posted on 11/15/2002 10:25:07 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
Valor's attorneys countered that I wasn't a piece of "junk" and that I had legitimate uses, including self-defense, which is how most guns get used.

I used to have one of these Raven .25s. It WAS junk.

These little pot-metal pieces of crap were probably more dangerous to the shooter than a bad guy, and their primary appeal was that they retailed for under $75.00. Shunned by serious shooters, their primary appeal seemed to be to newbies buying their first gun, with a strong black market appeal.

None of this has anything to do with how somebody uses it, or misuses it, in this case.

8 posted on 11/15/2002 10:26:58 AM PST by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
What religion is it that believes that spirits live in various objects?

It's either druidism or jedi.

9 posted on 11/15/2002 10:27:43 AM PST by CougarGA7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
The plaintiff's lawyer was Bob Montgomery, best known for representing Florida in its $11.3 billion victory over tobacco companies.

When somebody finally writes America's post-mortem this SOB and his ilk will feature prominently.

10 posted on 11/15/2002 10:29:40 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
To find all articles bumped to bang_list, click below:
click here >>> bang_list <<< click here
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)


Bookmark the bang_list.

11 posted on 11/15/2002 10:30:59 AM PST by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
These little pot-metal pieces of crap were probably more dangerous to the shooter than a bad guy

I'd like to know whether the teacher belonged to the NEA before judging whether he was really a bad guy.

(Kidding, kidding...)

12 posted on 11/15/2002 10:31:32 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
What's next? Knife manufacturing companies? Insanity.
13 posted on 11/15/2002 10:32:07 AM PST by CapedCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordian Blade
The victim's just as dead as if it'd been a .454 Casull.
14 posted on 11/15/2002 10:32:41 AM PST by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
I find it amazing that twelve individuals (jurors), collectively, don't have what amounts to one brain. What happened to their ability to think rationally? The lawyers representing the plaintiff in this case are also of an ilk lower than pond scum.
15 posted on 11/15/2002 10:34:51 AM PST by luvtheconstitution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
Why should this surprise anybody?

Ever since a jury awarded a woman millions for burning her lips on hot coffee from McD's the lawyer/sharks have taken the tact that nobody is responsible for their own behavior.

Now they sue McD's for contributing to a fat guy's obesity!

Hopefully this will be overturned on appeal. The bastard that stole the gun is solely responsible for the murder.

Let's hope gun manufacturers and distributors have the spine to fight this, unlike the tobacco companies.
16 posted on 11/15/2002 10:35:27 AM PST by conservativemusician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
Although I'm an inanimate object, I've been found legally culpable in the 2000 classroom shooting of a West Palm Beach, Florida school teacher.

This is the basis for all in rem forfeiture proceedings where the government attempts to take property that has been involved in illegal activity. The civil lawsuit is literally filed against the property and claims it was involved in illegality. The government claims that it is not an action against the owner of the property. Bull.
17 posted on 11/15/2002 10:36:24 AM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
I happen to own one of these POS. I bought it way back in 1978 , I think, for my wife
who was in real estate at the time wanted her to have something in her purse in those
empty houses and late nights at the office.
Being responsible, we went to the range to get her qualified, well she couldn't hit jack
S$%t, so I tried, the results were the same.
I threw it in the gun safe drawer where it is today.
I bought the wife a snub nosed .38, and she's is deadly with it.
That said, if your 2 - 3ft from your target..errr victim, it'll get the job done.
18 posted on 11/15/2002 10:39:38 AM PST by Robe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
I guess there isn't much hope of gettng justice with the Floriduh supreme court.
19 posted on 11/15/2002 10:39:55 AM PST by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Yes the victim is just as dead, but how does that make the manufacturer liable for his death? This is a case of a scumbag ambulance chasing lawyer with an anti gun agenda allowed to run rough shod over our rights and the rights of a legitimate business. It will not stop with the cheap guns, it will continue as long as we the people allow it to continue. I don't own one of these pieces of garbage, no self respecting shooter would, but in some cases this is the only weapon some people can afford. If these pistols are banned then an entire class effectively loses thier right to self defence, and thier 2nd ammendment rights have been trampled. We are all in this fight. Stay vigilant. Semper Fi
20 posted on 11/15/2002 10:47:02 AM PST by sean327
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson