And what exactly is so "whacky" about the article? Do you have anything specific you'd like to address concerning the information presented, or are you just giving it a big blanket ad hominem smear?
Yeah. Specifically, she has no evidence that the vaccination given her 2.5 year old child caused any of his problems. The only thing concrete that she can show is that her son collapsed after receiving the vaccine.
Her son has some problems. Obviously, she feels that somebody has to be blamed for this. I have news for her and for you: Life is not risk-free.