[Persuasion]

Exactly. And if a muslim has taken no action against
you or your country, killing them is not justified.

[phasma proeliator]

So you would proport only a strict "fire if fired upon" stance?

If I am understanding your position and your statement - then no individual enemy should be engaged until they have fired upon (or acted agressively) toward us?

Are you being so individualistic as to think that there were German (or japanese, or chinese, or Korean, or Somalian)soldiers who should not have been killed because they had never fired a shot of agression?