Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Fred Reed]: Birthing The Ogpu - Chronicles Of The Galloping Sovietization
Fred On Everything ^ | Nov 18, 2002 | Fred Reed

Posted on 11/17/2002 7:21:23 PM PST by SauronOfMordor




Birthing The Ogpu

Chronicles Of The Galloping Sovietization

 

It's going fast now. Not just the searches and growing federalization of law enforcement, but now the military as secret police. It's getting dark out there. I'm going to burrow into Tahiti with a brown maiden, change my name to Oogawaga, and hope they overlook me.

In Chicago on the flight to Guadalajara I was as usual detail searched by domestic aboriginals. They say searches are random, but they are lying. They would be random if mediated by a random-number generator, which they aren't. Somebody chooses who to harass. If you have a beard and a cowboy hat, or wear a Harley shirt, they'll randomly select you at least once per trip. I promise.

Which has nothing to do with security. They are searching people of whose appearance they disapprove. Priss cops.

I had my scuba gear in a shoulder bag. Our highly trained security mechanics pawed at it like monkeys who had found a fruit basket. Great. Kink the hose near a connection and I suddenly don't have air at 130 feet. One of these frauds pulled out my dive computer. He looked as if he wasn't sure whether to inspect it or peel it.

"What is this?" he asked.

"A coconut," I didn't say, or I would still be in jail. I did say, "A dive computer."

He looked at it without comprehension, then asked me again what it was. Presumably he suspected that it might have turned into something else in the intervening two seconds. It's how dive computers are. One minute a computer, the next minute a rainbow-colored unicorn.

Brainless thoroughness complemented thorough brainlessness. They pulled everything out, knowing what none of it was, and stuffed it back in, having accomplished nothing. The exercise was pointless. I had two dive lights containing twelve C-cells. They could have been carefully sealed Semtex. The dive computer could have been full of C4.

And the airlines wonder why people fly less.

Tell you what. I'm going to call Homeland Security in an Arabic accent and say, "We sending suicide bomber, he haff explosive prostate. Heeheehee!" Then I'll buy railroad stocks.

Anyway, to continue the grisly chronicles of unwanted security:

Having reached Guad, I was chowing down on really great ribs at Bruno's when a buddy handed me a printout from the Washington Times. First sentence: "Language tucked inside the Homeland Security bill will allow the federal government to track the e-mail, Internet use, travel, credit-card purchases, phone and bank records of foreigners and U.S. citizen in its hunt for terrorists."

Bingo. I told you it would happen, but I thought it would be slower-a gradual linking of DMV records state to state, police records becoming electronically available, and so on. Nope. We're going for the whole totalitarian enchilada at once. Yes indeedy. The Mommy State is going to watch us very carefully. For our own good.

Better yet, the Defense Department is going to run the Total Information Awareness program. (I didn't make that name up. I couldn't. TIA in Spanish means "aunt," which fits. Aunty will keep an eye on us.) Yep. The military is going to be another federal police force. You want to be watched, don't you? It's so we won't be terrorists.

Says the Times "Computers and analysts are supposed to use all this available information to determine patterns of people's behavior to detect and identify terrorists…."

Patterns of behavior. Data mining. If you have lunch three times at Kabob Bazaar, and charge ammunition at the shooting range where you take your daughter plinking, and read a book on torpedo design because you like military history-the computers will kick your name out, and the feds will show up to ransack your life.

I'd rather have the terrorists.

Note the attempt to sneak this cybernetic Stalinism surreptitiously into law. Legalizing unlimited surveillance of everybody is not trivial. If a worse law has been passed, I am unaware of it. You don't try to make massive changes in the tenor of society without mentioning it to the society. The White House knows this.

But that is exactly the scam being worked. It is underhanded, deliberately deceptive, far more dangerous to the country than Moslem terrorists. It is the product of minds that have no idea of how America is supposed to work.

If you think Aunty is going to be used only to fail to catch terrorists, you are kidding yourself. Knowledge is power. It gets used. I'm from Washington. I know. For example, the congressman who decides not to run again because his political enemies have discovered his taste for little boys. It happens.

Who of us doesn't have some skeleton moldering in the crawlway? Do you want your wife to know about the time at the Watermelon Growers convention when you ended up in the sack with that gal who, though married, wasn't married to you? You probably aren't going to make waves, are you?

Once the barrier is breached between governmental and private records, surveillance will grow like kudzu-so that we will be safe. If the government can have access to all existing records to protect us, it will shortly want to create new ones to protect us. At Fort Meade in Maryland broods the National Security Agency, which is not supposed to, and may not, spy domestically. It has phenomenal capacity for intercepting, decrypting, collating, storing. Just the thing for prospecting for terrorists, don't you think? You can bet the Homeland Security people have thought.

Fear not, though. These same Homeland Security people have said that, why no, they would never, ever, do anything wrong, and they even have a Privacy Officer to make sure. What could be more reassuring? Building a system to spy on Americans, the government assures us that it won't use it to spy on Americans, and to protect us against the possibility, the government will provide a Privacy Officer who works…for the government.

I never thought I could possibly Clinton back. The man was a detestable, lying, libidinous psychopath who did chunky interns, looted the White House, and sold pardons like an escapee from Chaucer-but he begins to look like a mere amiable clown. Bush means business.

If you are ever in Papeete, ask for Oogawaga.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; freedreed; homelandsecurity; patriotsact

1 posted on 11/17/2002 7:21:23 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Bump
2 posted on 11/17/2002 7:41:09 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Language tucked inside the Homeland Security bill will allow the federal government to track the e-mail, Internet use, travel, credit-card purchases, phone and bank records of foreigners and U.S. citizen in its hunt for terrorists.

And yet another big waste of government dollars is coming down the pike. Yes, a big honking database is useful for data mining. However, GIGO. Means garbage in, garbage out. So, starting now, you do this (if you aren't already.):

(1) Pay cash where you can. That means for most stuff. That gets around 95% of monitoring.

(2) If you are making phone calls you don't want people to know about, use a disposible phone card and a pay phone.

(3) If you are paranoid about your email being tracked, use one of the really good encryption schemes. And one of those garbage free email accounts. Or just use one of those garbage accounts, accessed from your public library or internet cafe, and embed your text in a JPG image file. Of course, for most of us we don't really care if the big bad govenment reads our email anyway - but if you do care, do the above. But realize that unless the feds are already monitoring you personally, or someone you are communicating with, you are free and clear anyway - the email is broken into little packets and routed through different channels. They would have to be monitoring all the mailservers and there are thousands of them. And you can always set up your own mailserver.

(4) Whenever you sign up for anything on the internet, use a bogus name, age, gender, salary, educational level, and marital status. Use different stuff each time. This not only will mess up government tracking but it totally prevents the companies that buy internet cookie data from getting a picture of who you are.

(5) Open and close credit card accounts. Keep an account or two permanently, but for rental car, airplane, and hotel purchases use accounts that you close down every 6 months. Make sure that your credit card applications use incorrect middle initials. If your first name is John, spell it Jon, Johnn, Jahn, and Jan. If your last name is Smith spell it Smyth, Smythe, and Smithe. "Accidentally" transpose two numbers in your SSN. Open up a box at "Mailboxes Etc." and use that as your address of record. Close the box and get a new one every year. Use the box only for your "rotating" credit card accounts.

Now, what does all this do? First, paying cash makes most purchases invisible. Rotating cards with slightly different SSN's, names, and address changes means that your data gets mixed in with other people's. Thus the data becomes contaminated. Data mining is not useful for garbage.

Of course, if you are a primary suspect in a major felony investigation they will drag the data swamp, pull everything out, and match all this back to you, pretty much. But that's not what this is about. This is about muddying that waters regarding ordinary citizens to prevent them from pulling out data that might identify you on a general data search. Suppose they decide to look for anyone who is consuming 500 rounds of ammo a month at gun ranges and who travels to a particular gun show in a particular city every year. The above tactics will ensure that you are invisible even if you fit that profile.

Good luck, fellow fish in the data sea!

3 posted on 11/17/2002 8:26:05 PM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
You are right in a micro sense.

The point is that we should not have to do this. If it comes to the point where we need to follow your directions in order to be somewhat anonymous, then I say that it is the time to start Revolutionary War II, ....or join Fred in Tahiti.
4 posted on 11/17/2002 9:49:46 PM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; PatrioticAmerican; Squantos; wardaddy; harpseal; Myrddin
ping.
5 posted on 11/17/2002 10:06:02 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
In Albuquerque, at least, use of cash for buying Amtrak tickets is a flag in itself. Your other suggestions are not too bad, but they also raise data-mining flags.

It doesn't matter if the information is correct, only that it is useful.
6 posted on 11/17/2002 10:12:48 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
(1) Pay cash where you can. That means for most stuff. That gets around 95% of monitoring.

For the moment. Most people get cash from ATMs, and the new cash has a magnetic stripe embedded. The next simple step is to have the ATM mechanism record the serial#s of the bills as they're dispensed, along with the account dispensed to. When you make purchases with $20s, the vendor generally winds up depositing the 20s in his bank. Matching up serial#s would create a picture of who you do business with, and who the customers of a particular vendor are

7 posted on 11/18/2002 7:12:05 AM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
The next simple step is to have the ATM mechanism record the serial#s of the bills as they're dispensed, along with the account dispensed to

Simple conceptually. Not simple technically. Completely new machines would have to be rolled out and integrated into a monitoring system. And other systems would have to be able to track the bills from vendors - eg. grocery store cash deposits at the bank.

Conceptually simple, yes. Hard and expensive to implement? Yes. And unless the government pays, the banks (private organizations) are not going to foot the bill. And I doubt the government can fund it without spending a ton of money and time. Could it happen someday? Probably. But not for quite a while.

8 posted on 11/18/2002 7:42:45 AM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
We must have lost the war for we are certainly losing our freedom.
9 posted on 11/18/2002 8:07:04 AM PST by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green
Ever think that one reason the space program terminated, and why NASA & FAA together effectively prevent anyone from starting a private space company is that - if that happened, we would have a place to escape to?
10 posted on 11/18/2002 9:03:01 AM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Building a system to spy on Americans, the government assures us that it won't use it to spy on Americans, and to protect us against the possibility, the government will provide a Privacy Officer who works…for the government.

Nice that he caught this. All on the same payroll, expected to act as a watchdog. Great article!!!

11 posted on 11/18/2002 9:11:45 AM PST by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson