Veeeery curious how #3Fan labeled people puritans for being disgusted by the thought. LOL...liberal disruptor...I knew it!
I'm beginning to think you're crazy. I've repeated to you several times that my purpose was to show more than one opinion on this issue of this picture. You couldn't accept that and tried for twenty posts to change my mind that it's OK to falsely imply any abomination you want saying I should learn proper ediquette (sic probably...too late in the thread to go through the trouble of looking it up) from Leno and prime-time TV. Since I'm not willing to change my mind and define deviancy down, you now call me a liberal.
I think a lot of you people are misguided puritans. Like the female poster said that I quoted above, you're turning something normal into something perverse. No different train of thought from the what happened in Salem. You said that puritans couldn't be crude. Would you say that burning ~20 women at the stake wasn't crude. Those were puritans that did that.
I'm not saying you people will resort to murder of course, but these threads do add to the stereotypes that the liberal media likes to heave on us. There are plenty of things to criticize Al Gore for. Let's not redefine normal behaviour as perverse in order to get a cheap, false, crude shot in. It's not necessary and it takes away from our credibility.
This is the first time I've seen the "consensual incest" topic mentioned on this thread. I thought this thread was about the picture, not NAMBLA's position on issues. So you're saying that since NAMBLA is a leftist organization, it's OK to falsely accuse Gore of anything you want? Since David Duke ran as a Republican, is it OK to accuse Bush of any abomination?
Why don't you stick to the truth. Al Gore has plenty of faults to criticize him for, you don't have to make up things like his supporting "consensual incest" to get a cheap shot in. Do you have any quotes from Al Gore where he supports consensual incest?