Replies

I think I read very carefully. You have played both sides of this argument, but that's okay.

I don't think I have been hysterical or overly paranoid in this discussion, and I have not spread lies or half-truths.
I have stated the obvious. There are risks - there will be casualties.

Those casualties will be broadcast on every news network and we will know their names, their faces, and their grieving family members. It will be a political football and some will try to blame Bush. No matter how we do this, it is going to be a BIG deal and there will be personal and political ramifications.

It's certainly understandable why this has been such a hot topic here for a while and if you are already weary of the discussion here on FR and think no one here has anything to contribute to the dialog, I'm afraid you are doomed to be annoyed by hundreds more threads about this before it's all done. Goodnight and stay well.

No, your reading comprehension and logic / reasoning capability, has led you quite astray, since you seem to have misconstrued what I have written.

You bet I am sick and tired of people trying to stir up this garbage. I know that it won't stop. It's just that FR used to be filled with more people, who didn't get appoplectic about what are assumptions.

Will the Dems use smallpox vacinations ( whether given or not ) against the president ? OF COURSE THE SHALL ! They use the fact that heh's breathing, against him.