Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Churchill set to win Greatest Briton
The Evening Standard ^ | November 22, 2002 | Patrick Sawer

Posted on 11/22/2002 4:53:32 AM PST by MadIvan

Winston Churchill is poised to become the Greatest Briton when voting closes in the BBC2 poll on Sunday night.

He currently lies in third place behind Isambard Kingdom Brunel and Princess Diana but a late surge in voting is expected to put him in pole position.

There has been a rush of between 90,000 and 100,000 votes for each of the top 10 candidates in the Great Britons series. Tonight, former Northern Ireland secretary Mo Mowlam makes the case for Britain's great wartime prime minister.

A BBC2 spokeswoman said: "Brunel is ahead by quite a margin but he is not unbeatable. There are 90,000 votes between Brunel in first place and Churchill in third, with Diana slightly ahead of Churchill in second place."

Voting will close at 10.45pm, as Anne Robinson and Peter Snow present the closing arguments. The programme will feature some of the candidates' descendants and celebrity backers, including Churchill's granddaughter Emma Soames, and David Bellamy supporting Charles Darwin. The result will be announced around 11pm.

Behind Churchill is Darwin, then William Shakespeare, Isaac Newton, John Lennon, Elizabeth I, Horatio Nelson and Oliver Cromwell. When Diana shot into second place, critics argued the show's format was ill-suited to serious assessment.

Then it was revealed that students at Brunel University had tried to push their man to the top with block voting. But the rows have not stopped Britons flocking to vote.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: churchill; greatest; winston
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: MadIvan
He was an engineer - built a lot of bridges and railways.

No relation to Bergholt Stuttley "Bloody Stupid" Johnson, I hope!

(A Discworld reference...)

Ankh-Morpork's most acclaimed architect. During his lifetime his name was often associated with varied curses preceding or following it. Although more commonly known as "Bloody Stupid" Johnson, he had many other titles, including 'Bloody Stupid "It Might Look A Bit Messy Now But Just You Come Back In Five Hundred Years Time" Johnson'.

Despite being a remarkable architect, his downfall lay in his numerical skills, or more accurately, scales. Famed are his ornamental cruet set (designed for Mad Lord Snapcase, the saltshaker now houses four families, the pepper shaker is used for grain storage), and the Colossus of Ankh-Morpork (kept in a matchbox by the caretaker of the Dwarf Bread Museum. His two masterpieces are without doubt the Palace grounds, with it's hoho (like a haha, only deeper) and the Unseen University organ (currently played by the University Librarian, the organ has over 400 knobs, the purpose of many is unknown).

Another of his remarked achievements was an attempt at making an enormous pie. Unfortunately the whistling blackbird statue designed to relieve internal pressures was not finished on schedule and is now in Hide Park as a memorial to those lost in the explosion.

Of course B.S.Johnson's greatest gift to Morpork would have to be the phrase "Well you've really Johnsoned that up."

21 posted on 11/22/2002 5:49:17 AM PST by Jonah Hex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Yep
Brits loved the liberals until Hitler went on a rampage
So they voted in Sir Winston to save them . Soon as the war in Europe was won ( still raging in the Pacific), BACK came the liberals and adios Sir Winston

Just remember it happened here with Bush 1 and Clinton and can happen again to Bush 2

People get addicted to more and more liberalism until their butts are threatened
22 posted on 11/22/2002 5:50:15 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; wimpycat
Churchill ping!

"I therefore preach continually the doctrine of the fraternal association of our two peoples, not for any purpose of gaining invidious material advantages for either of them, not for territorial aggrandisement or the vain pomp of earthly domination, but for the sake of service to mankind and for the honour that comes to those who faithfully serve great causes."

-Winston S. Churchill
The Price of Greatness is Responsibility
Harvard, 1943

23 posted on 11/22/2002 5:51:15 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Thanks. Voted for Churchill. The rest of Europe collapsed under Nazi aggression - Churchill stood firm. I tend to think that "W" looks more like Churchill than Reagan.

For some reason, after I voted for Churchill, I was asked to rate John Lennon's abilities. I am rather neutral on Lennon and thus gave him rather neutral ratings.
24 posted on 11/22/2002 5:55:34 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: MadIvan
I can't wait for his acceptance speech.
26 posted on 11/22/2002 6:02:54 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Ah, my dear Ivan, shall we ask the Welsh about Mr Churchill's excellent qualities?

Should we ask about the lotteries and the price to read his memoirs? Shall we ask about his crossing the aisle from Tory to Labour to Tory?

Then there are the Aussies. Shall we ask them about Mr Churchill?

27 posted on 11/22/2002 6:04:56 AM PST by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
My vote is for Newton. He was the one Briton that did more for the world than any other. Of course, Churchill did more for Britain so I guess there's a little inherent bias.
28 posted on 11/22/2002 6:05:22 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: doberville
Ah, my dear Ivan, shall we ask the Welsh about Mr Churchill's excellent qualities?

Will we even comprehend their reply, let alone be able to spell-check it?

29 posted on 11/22/2002 6:06:29 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
A llikely llament....

;-)

30 posted on 11/22/2002 6:12:04 AM PST by Jonah Hex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: doberville
Should we ask about the lotteries and the price to read his memoirs? Shall we ask about his crossing the aisle from Tory to Labour to Tory?

You're misinformed from the get-go. He went to the Liberals, not Labour.

Ivan

31 posted on 11/22/2002 6:16:01 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
There have been plenty of great ones not on the list but how in the world could any sane person vote for Princess Di or John Lennon?

I am not a fan of Di and positively dislike Lennon (although did like some of his music) but even if I did like them there is not much to indicate greatness.

I would probably vote for Churchill although Viscount Garnet Wolsley would be right up there too.

I also think Bernard L Montgomery was under-rated by history. The reason I think he was great is because his opponents rated him so highly.

32 posted on 11/22/2002 6:24:10 AM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Where does Shakespeare come into all of this? If he's not in the top 5, there's something wrong with you people. If the criteria include greatest impact and influence on society, I would include Shakespeare, Samuel Johnson, Isaac Newton, Charles Darwin, Henry II and Edward I (for their foundation of the legal system, the creation of a martyr and major pilgrimage site, giving Geoffrey Chaucer something to write about), and even Oliver Cromwell (for his impact on the Irish, if nothing else), Samuel Pepys, who was British to the bone, a charter member of the Royal Society, and laid the foundation for the great British Navy, thereby enabling Britain to become a great colonial power. I could go on and on. All of these would be very credible choices.

What about Bishop Langly (Langely? Langley? sp?)who was insturmental in pushing through the Magna Carta? W/o his constant prodding it probably would have never been written, much less signed.

"O, Runnymead, O Runnymead. What say the reeds at Runnymead..."

33 posted on 11/22/2002 6:53:51 AM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Churchill is now #3 behind Brunel and Diana (1 & 2).
34 posted on 11/22/2002 6:57:43 AM PST by CreekerFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
Yep Brits loved the liberals until Hitler went on a rampage So they voted in Sir Winston to save them . Soon as the war in Europe was won ( still raging in the Pacific), BACK came the liberals and adios Sir Winston

Huh? The Tories came into power starting in 1935, well before hostilities began, unless you're speaking from a Sino-centric point of view.

35 posted on 11/22/2002 6:59:52 AM PST by andy_card
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: doberville
Shall we ask about his crossing the aisle from Tory to Labour to Tory?

Churchill was a liberal, for a while, never a labourite.

36 posted on 11/22/2002 7:01:41 AM PST by andy_card
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
I also think Bernard L Montgomery was under-rated by history.

Its impossible to underrate Monty. I think Operation Market-Garden proved that rather well.

The reason I think he was great is because his opponents rated him so highly.

His biggest opponents were in the Combined Joint Chiefs of Staff. But I assume you're towing the line, "if the Wehrmacht says so, it must be true!"

One of the things I really don't understand is why Erwin Rommel is rated so high in the English-speaking world. The English created his reputation as a demi-God as an excuse for why he kept handing their asses to them, until he ran out of supplies. Of course, they boosted it further still when Monty started winning. But the British victories had nothing to do with Monty's skill as a commander, and everything to do with who had the supplies.

37 posted on 11/22/2002 7:15:15 AM PST by andy_card
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
I also think Bernard L Montgomery was under-rated by history. The reason I think he was great is because his opponents rated him so highly.

I think the record shows that Montgomery is vastly over-rated. He won precious few battles and -none- where he did not have overwhelming superiority. The Americans were on the brink of asking for his removal in Normandy.

There's a book called "Churchill and the Montgomery Myth" by R.W. Thompson. Thompson says that Montgomery's thinking didn't advance one whit from 1918 until the day he died. The record confirms it.

Walt

38 posted on 11/22/2002 7:17:50 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
No, no, no.

Boadicea for best Briton.

Churchill for best American. His mother was American, and he himself was awarded honorary American citizenship at a time when the British couldn't care less for him.

39 posted on 11/22/2002 7:17:56 AM PST by andy_card
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Oliver Cromwell made the freakin' list?
40 posted on 11/22/2002 7:18:13 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson