[FormerLib]

Yes, Wylie provides a proper footnote for every single quotation. Correct attribution of cited materials.

Indeed, he can cite another Presbyterian author with whom he agrees! ;-)

And you'll have to excuse me, but that leaves me categorically unconvinced.

It is heartening to do a Google search on "Celtic Orthodoxy" however and see how many are re-connecting to their Eastern Orthodox roots.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

Indeed, he can cite another Presbyterian author with whom he agrees! ;-) And you'll have to excuse me, but that leaves me categorically unconvinced. It is heartening to do a Google search on "Celtic Orthodoxy" however and see how many are re-connecting to their Eastern Orthodox roots.

If you mean that Wylie's (numerous) direct citations of Sedulius Scotus are "another Presbyterian author with whom he agrees"...

...You're largely right!! Sedulius Scotus WAS essentially Calvinist Presbyterian in his theology. Nice of you to admit it.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

Indeed, he can cite another Presbyterian author with whom he agrees!

Not to mention Wylie's direct and properly footnoted citations of Claudius Scotus, Gallus the fellow-labourer of Columbanus, et cetera...

I guess we can chalk up these Celtic Orthodox Fathers as "yet more Presbyterian authors" with whom Wylie agrees! Just as you say.