Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to Sign Homeland Security Bill
Fox News ^ | Monday, November 25, 2002 | AP

Posted on 11/25/2002 9:12:06 AM PST by Sparta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Brillant pick. Who's going to be the deputy, Vicente Fox.
21 posted on 11/25/2002 9:53:06 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Victor
"You know what? If you're not a terrorist, and you keep your nose clean, basically a law-abiding citizen and still entitled to your Constitutional rights....why do you fear so???"

Three points.

1) The right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure has been greatly eroded. (Though as another poster above noted, the "Patriot" act is much worse on this point.)

2) Whether one is a terrorist or not is something that is determined *after* the exercise of these new powers. It is not possible to employ these new powers *only* on terrorists. The ostensible purpose of the new powers is after all, to *identify* terrorists. So the fact that I am not a terrorist provides little, if any, protection against these new powers.

3) The stated purpose of any law is seldom the only purpose for which it is eventually used. In fact, stated purposes of laws often have *nothing whatsoever* to do with the law's eventual effects. Rather than examining stated purposes, it is better to analyze laws according to the incentives and constraints they create, and the actual legal language that defines exceptions or constraints upon the law.
22 posted on 11/25/2002 9:53:52 AM PST by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: deport
Do you have a link to it?
23 posted on 11/25/2002 9:54:19 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Victor
You know what? If you're not a terrorist, and you keep your nose clean, basically a law-abiding citizen and still entitled to your Constitutional rights....why do you fear so???

The people whose FBI files were used by Clinton to bring them into line, do you think they were terrorists?

24 posted on 11/25/2002 9:55:19 AM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
I don't agree with your premise. Clinton violated the law; will violate any law for political gain. In his case (as in the case of any outlaw) it doesn't matter what laws are on the books.
25 posted on 11/25/2002 9:59:24 AM PST by Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c107:3:./temp/~c107auOcnG::

This link won't stay hot long.... as Thomas kills it shortly after you connect. If it doens't work then the following and click on 5005 about 5 down from the top in the 3rd column.... good luck

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/vote_menu_107_2.htm
26 posted on 11/25/2002 10:01:11 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: deport
I'm sorry, but all it does is shuffle papers from one agency to another. The fundamental problems(unwillingness to combat illegal immigration) still remain.
27 posted on 11/25/2002 10:05:44 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Sparta
From Drudge:

SENATOR ASHCROFT HAD WARNED: 'KEEP
BIG BROTHER'S HANDS OFF THE
INTERNET': 'The [Clinton]
administration's interest in all
e-mail is a wholly unhealthy
precedent, especially given this
administration's track record on FBI
files and IRS snooping. Every medium
by which people communicate can be
subject to exploitation by those
with illegal intentions.
Nevertheless, this is no reason to
hand Big Brother the keys to unlock
our e-mail diaries, open our ATM
records, read our medical records,
or translate our international
communications' -- Ashcroft, Oct
'97...
29 posted on 11/25/2002 10:10:22 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victor
I don't agree with your premise. Clinton violated the law; will violate any law for political gain. In his case (as in the case of any outlaw) it doesn't matter what laws are on the books.

The power of the Presidency has been vastly enhanced by this bill. Future (or even current) presidents wouldn't even HAVE to break the law in order to stifle dissent.

30 posted on 11/25/2002 10:10:42 AM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Revel
Ashcroft being a hypocrite, what else is new.
31 posted on 11/25/2002 10:11:50 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: freddy
I think the Bush admin would use it more against Foriegners as the Clinonistas would use it more against political enemies such as rape victims, weird religious cults, and Elian Gonzalez.
32 posted on 11/25/2002 10:14:28 AM PST by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Well we shall see won't we. It takes time to do anything in this beauracy..... We can hope for the best. Unless you have an instant solution and can implement it.
33 posted on 11/25/2002 10:16:10 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: All
Bush set to sign Homeland Security bill any minute now.
35 posted on 11/25/2002 10:20:27 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Agreed we need a good go-to guy south of the border... not "bus 'em over" foX..
36 posted on 11/25/2002 10:21:22 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I was being sarcastic.
37 posted on 11/25/2002 10:22:53 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
A sad day for freedom in America.

Only if you're a terrorist or criminal.

38 posted on 11/25/2002 10:23:20 AM PST by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Yep sounds like a winner to me.... now can you implement it or get the gov't to.
39 posted on 11/25/2002 10:24:11 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Over 50 years since this massive a re-org has been done in the federal govt. History in the making. 22 agencies become as 1, sort of.

For my next trick, world peace..

Good luck, President Bush.
40 posted on 11/25/2002 10:31:19 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson