Replies

Your idea is sound. Your ultimate goal is well defined. However, the "way to win the war" or "do it right" is vague. What do you propose as to what is the "right way" to win this war? Extremist radicals would say, "Nuke every country in the world!" Leftists would say, "Do everything the Muslims want and beg them to forgive us." What do YOU say? If you can tell everyone this then you might get more responses.

I'll answer if you don't mind:

Select your target based on best intelligence and determination of greatest - near term - threat.

Then kick the living shi* out of them.
Stop when they cannot possibly rise from the ashes until the second coming,
Then help them up to some level suitable to the world order you deem to be appropriate.

Those who are a threat in the longer term you talk with, offer consideration for moderation, determine their willingness to continue negotiations.
And put them on the "A list" if they don't show promise.

Hence, Mexico and Iraq, Palestine and North Korea, are prime members of the "you're next" list.
I'd recommend much of Latin America, and Albania would be vary close to following in their footsteps.
France and Germany don't have the guts to carry forward with their little schemes if there is no one out there waiving their flags in support.

First, I hope that you read the full Post and not just the synopsis. I purposely left the post brief. I wanted to get interest before I elaborated. I figure that most people would not want to read multipage post. Now that I see that I have sparked interest, I will write a more detailed list of what issues W. I. N. would push to help win the war.
I do not agree with ether of the "Extremist" views that you listed, and will shortly give a detailed list of what I believe is necessary.
Thank you for your interest...and hopefully I will soon be able to persuaded you to become a member.