Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Homosexual' is banned (POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD ALERT)
The Sun ^ | November 27, 2002 | DAVID WOODING

Posted on 11/26/2002 11:42:29 PM PST by MadIvan

GAYS have had the word homosexual banned by the Government because they say it is offensive.

Ministers want it written out of their vocabulary after complaints that it was outdated.

Instead they will refer to those with an “orientation towards people of the same sex”.

Homosexual, coined 130 years ago, will be ditched under anti-discrimination laws drawn up by equality minister Barbara Roche.

Whitehall officials will be told not to use the term in official documents, speeches, press releases or white papers.

Last night a spokesman for Mrs Roche, 48, denied the move was political correctness.

He said: “There was a strong feeling that homosexual wasn’t the way forward in defining sexual orientation. There were various concerns.”

Gays’ objection to the word homosexual was revealed while mum-of-one Mrs Roche was doing a consultation exercise last year.

The paper, called Towards Equality and Diversity, contained the Government’s plans to tackle sexual and religious discrimination.

For decades homosexual was regarded as a non-discriminatory alternative to words like queer, fairy and poof.

But since gay took over as the most popular description in the 1960s, homosexual is seen by some as a term of abuse.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: homosexual; homosexualagenda; pc; pcpolice; poofters; samesexdisorder; sodomites; vocabulary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: MadIvan
Well that took you all of 3 minutes to post. I love this stimulus/response thing...
21 posted on 11/27/2002 12:35:52 AM PST by constable tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Hmmm. How long before they consider it hate speech to use the word homosexual?

That's still better than "turd miner" or "f__kin'faggot".

22 posted on 11/27/2002 12:37:43 AM PST by The Real Deal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: The Real Deal
That's still better than "turd miner"

Wow! 21 minutes and it's part of the vocabulary.

23 posted on 11/27/2002 12:41:12 AM PST by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Dear God, please tell me someone else out there sees the humor in that John Cleese photo. If you can't have a sense of humor (sorry - humour) on a thread like this, you really should check yourself by breathing against a mirror.

Ivan and I can't be the only ones who remember the Ministry of Silly Walks bit, can we?
24 posted on 11/27/2002 12:44:08 AM PST by constable tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Good - but I'm kind of partial to "turd burgler" myself. It has just the right larcenous connotation for my sense of humor.
25 posted on 11/27/2002 12:48:03 AM PST by constable tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Your definition of Banana will be permitted to stand but that definition for Car just won't suffice:

Cars will now be referred to as "multi-passenger mechanized conveyance".

Car - selfish mechanized conveyance designed to cause environmental impact and avoid mass transit.

26 posted on 11/27/2002 12:59:05 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Well what about the time honored: fudge packer, daisy, blue boy, d*ck-sucker, ball grabber....?
27 posted on 11/27/2002 1:00:44 AM PST by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Oooh, oooh, wait: pillow biter....yeah, can't forget that one. :0)
28 posted on 11/27/2002 1:01:24 AM PST by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
instead use the phrase "orientation towards people of the same sex" to define gays and lesbians.

Doesn't this discriminate against trees?

29 posted on 11/27/2002 1:03:23 AM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: constable tom
You're not, you're not. How can England, the land that brough us Monty Python and Benny Hill, have sunk so low into PC quagmires?
30 posted on 11/27/2002 1:05:26 AM PST by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: The Real Deal
I had a friend of mine almost start a fight in front of me in a London steak house when the guy who had sat there before us asked him if he'd seen his faggots? T. jumped up and was ready to throw down, when I "humbly" interrupted him to inform him that the guy was looking for his cigarrets.
32 posted on 11/27/2002 1:17:57 AM PST by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
So... if you call a c*ck-sucker...

a c*ck-sucker, is it an insult...

or a descriptive phrase???

33 posted on 11/27/2002 1:31:21 AM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Me too. Homosexual sounds like a statement of fact, not a slur. But I learned the hard way when running for a seat on my university's student government some 11 years ago that it's a no-no. I met before the GLAAD group to seek their endorsement, and used the term homosexual in our talks. One guy corrected me, said that they prefer the word gay.

I didn't get their endorsement, but neither did anyone else.

34 posted on 11/27/2002 1:32:08 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Well once they bann the word all the problems will be over..
35 posted on 11/27/2002 1:45:25 AM PST by .45MAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
orientation towards people of the same sex

Won't orienteers be offended? That's a bit wordy. Orientation Towards People Of The Same Sex = OTPOFTS. *L*

36 posted on 11/27/2002 1:46:39 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Stamping out the word homosexual.....
37 posted on 11/27/2002 1:49:42 AM PST by .45MAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
Won't orienteers be offended? That's a bit wordy. Orientation Towards People Of The Same Sex = OTPOFTS. *L*

It could create a backlash. If I have to worry about the word "homosexual" being offensive, I may just as well say "poofters". ;)

Love, Ivan

38 posted on 11/27/2002 1:51:05 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
What I find funny, is that the majority of gay men I know..prefer to be called gays over anything else. How many words do they want?
39 posted on 11/27/2002 1:53:14 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: constable tom
>>Ivan and I can't be the only ones who remember the Ministry of Silly Walks bit, can we?

My son has the t-shirt.


I think we should all settle on the classic "fudge-packer".

40 posted on 11/27/2002 1:56:43 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson