Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christian Group Questions Tendency To 'Tiptoe Around Islam'
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 11/27/02 | Patrick Goodenough

Posted on 11/27/2002 2:54:55 AM PST by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - A Christian research organization has decried what it called the "disturbing trend" of media and politicians to blame those who arouse Muslim violence, rather than those who actually carry out that violence.

Commenting on the uproar in Nigeria over the Miss World beauty pageant, the UK-based Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity (ISIC) said Nigerian politicians and Western media alike were trying to "rationalize" the violence perpetrated by Muslim youths late last week.

More than 200 people were killed in rioting in Kaduna state, after a newspaper published an article Muslims found offensive.

The article in This Day questioned the opposition Muslims had voiced to plans to hold the annual Miss World beauty competition in Nigeria next month. The writer said that Mohammed, had he been alive today, might even have chosen a wife from among the beauty pageant contestants.

The violence erupted several days after the article appeared, following a call by Islamic leaders for Muslims to attack the paper. According to eyewitness accounts, Muslim youths ran riot, killing and wounding Christians and attacking churches and businesses.

Muslims were killed in retaliatory attacks launched by Christians, who comprise about 40 percent of the population of Kaduna.

Even before the article was published, some Muslim groups had threatened to disrupt the Miss World contest, prompting organizers to postpone the finale until the Muslim fast month of Ramadan was over, rescheduling it for Dec. 7.

The violence led the contest organizers to evacuate participants and relocate the event to Britain.

Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo attributed the developments to a "conspiracy" by the international press, and also blamed "irresponsible journalism" by This Day for the violence. A senior editor was detained for several days.

For her part, Miss World head organizer Julia Morley at a London press conference also laid the blame on "a journalist who made a remark that absolutely infuriated young Muslims."

Some Western feminists were quoted as blaming the beauty contest.

But the ISIC said the wrong people were being accused.

The moral responsibility for the killings "must lie with the Muslim youths who perpetrated the latest violence and with the extremist leaders who cynically manipulated and fostered it," it argued in a briefing.

"In recent years there has been an increasingly disturbing trend amongst some sections of Western media, church and society to place more blame at the door of those who arouse Muslim violence with mere words, than with the perpetrators of that violence," the ISIC said.

It recalled that when Western missionaries were threatened with a death sentence by the Taliban in Afghanistan in August 2001 for sharing their faith with Muslims, the Christians were themselves blamed by many journalists for "not being more sensitive to local culture."

After U.S. evangelist Jerry Falwell early last month called Muhammad a "terrorist" and a "man of war," Muslim riots in India left eight people dead.

"Once again the overwhelming sense given by the media and political and church leaders was that responsibility for this lay with Falwell, not with those who rioted."

It was not the responsibility of political and religious leaders to tiptoe around issues involving Islam, afraid of causing offense for fear this could trigger violence, said the ISIC.

"No such considerations are made for the sensitivities of other religious groups."

The ISIC also said important facts were being overlooked by most Western media reporting on the Nigerian situation.

Nigeria was not an Islamic country, it said, and the contest was not to have been held in parts of the country that were mainly Muslim.

"One group in society should not be allowed to use violence to push its demands on the whole."

The ISIC also challenged the view portrayed in some media reports that the beauty contest was "an example of western cultural imperialism seeking to push its decadent ways on a more modest and reluctant third world society."

Nigeria won the 2002 hosting rights because Miss Nigeria last year took the Miss World title, and the government enthusiastically backed the event, seeing it as an opportunity to showcase the country.

Nigeria's slight Muslim majority is centered in the north of the country, where many states have introduced strict Islamic ( shari'a ) law, while the south is predominantly Christian and animist.


See also:
Muslims Urged To Kill Nigerian Journalist (Nov. 27, 2002)
Miss World Pageant Moves To London After Violent Clashes (Nov. 25, 2002)


Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

 

 



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/27/2002 2:54:55 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Today's politically correct victim is the Religion Of Peace.
2 posted on 11/27/2002 2:56:35 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This episode of bloodshed might finally have turned the tide of Western opinion. That the ultimate object was a newspaper comment about a beauty contest, an event widely regarded as a complete frivolity, actually helps the muddleheaded to see the truth of the thing laid bare.

Muslims call Islam a religion. It's not a religion. Religion is about an individual's relationship with his concept of God or Gods. Though the religious man might want others to share his views, he never forgets that the proper focus of his religious passions is himself, the one and only person for whose moral soundness and salvation he has an inalienable responsibility. Put another way, true religious feeling is always married to a fundamental humility.

We of the Judeo-Christian West, long steeped in the broth of individual moral responsibility, could never evade this recognition, though we seldom articulate it. It's one of the reasons why the more aggressively evangelical creeds elicit distaste from most of us; through their behavior, they contradict the premise of humility before God.

Muslims and Islam, who proclaim a unilateral privilege of imposing their creed on the whole world by force, are not playing by the same rules. They're acting according to the premises, not of religion, but of total war -- that all that matters is prevailing over the enemy, that there are no moral bounds upon what one may do to prevail, and that the "infidel," being a moral subhuman, has no rights at all with which to defend himself against a Muslim. Conquest is all.

Combine this with the insane Muslim belief that a victorious enemy can deprive a Muslim of his afterlife in Paradise by burying him in a pigskin. Nothing could be more antithetical to the premise of moral individuality. From these things, it's clear that Islam is a militant collectivism -- a form of groupthink with totalitarian aims -- and not a religion at all. Therefore, Islam cannot coexist with other religions, or with Western values. The West's war is indeed with Islam, not with some splinter faction that has "perverted" Islam's fundamental values. Islam's fundamental values are inherently perverse.

Though the spilling of blood in Nigerian streets over the inconsequential Miss World pageant and the entirely defensible, historically well founded remark of a newswriter is tragic, it could also be the last straw for the frenzied defenders of the "religion of peace." For this, we must be thankful.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

3 posted on 11/27/2002 3:25:50 AM PST by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fporretto; Thinkin' Gal; Jeremiah Jr; Prodigal Daughter; shaggy eel; babylonian; ...
>From these things, it's clear that Islam is a militant collectivism -- a form of groupthink with totalitarian aims -- and not a religion at all.

Or it is a satanic religion.

"Pat Robertson has the issue right. He knows that Islam, despite the existence of millions of "bad" Muslims who reject some of the fundamental tenets of their faith, is a religion of war not peace, that any country with a sizable population of even bad Muslims contains a ticking time bomb, ready to go off in hard times when confused people begin looking for their spiritual roots. When Christians find their roots, they find the Prince of Peace. When Muslims rediscover theirs, it is Muhammad the terrorist.   I wish no ill to Muslims, either as human beings or as adherents of a religion I reject. I would like to leave Muslims alone, in exchange for being left alone."  Thomas Fleming,  LITTLE WHITE LIES (Administration tells about Islam)

4 posted on 11/27/2002 3:55:58 AM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Before a spark hits the gasoline, it is the GASOLINE that has the potential to destroy -not the spark.
5 posted on 11/27/2002 4:34:51 AM PST by kinsman redeemer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
a Jacksonian reaction datum ping!
6 posted on 11/27/2002 4:43:43 AM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fporretto
That is exactly what I think, too. Good post!
7 posted on 11/27/2002 4:48:37 AM PST by Morrigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
you know, part of the problem is the muslim belief system. destroy it, and you end terrorism.

however, for this to happen you must first destroy the media as it presently exists. The number one reason problems exist and are not ever fixed is the media. Change it and society will improve. Period.
8 posted on 11/27/2002 4:52:40 AM PST by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fporretto
The West's war is indeed with Islam, not with some splinter faction that has "perverted" Islam's fundamental values. Islam's fundamental values are inherently perverse.

It's Islam stupid.™

9 posted on 11/27/2002 4:53:31 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Falwell can add one more word to his description-pedophile. Mohammed's youngest wife was a nine-year-old.
10 posted on 11/27/2002 6:13:20 AM PST by nonliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

It was not the responsibility of political and religious leaders to tiptoe around issues involving Islam, afraid of causing offense for fear this could trigger violence, said the ISIC.

"No such considerations are made for the sensitivities of other religious groups."

from the story above.

TRUTH

ISLAM IS THE ENEMY!

11 posted on 11/27/2002 6:16:40 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
If anybody in America started a cult today that believes and teaches what the Mecca cult does, he and his membership would be annihilated much quicker than David Koresh was!

Koresh never hurt ANYONE, remember: never even sent out the hate speech letters, though the real authors wanted to see Koresh blamed for them.

12 posted on 11/27/2002 6:17:26 AM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson