Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Say goodbye to the golden land
World Net Daily ^ | November 27, 2002 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 11/27/2002 7:23:35 AM PST by Sparta

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© 2002 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

That 70 percent fall in the NASDAQ and 25 percent decline in the Dow, and the recession and unemployment they produced, have begun to cause major collateral damage to municipal and state budgets.

The Empire State and the Big Apple are staring at a combined deficit of $15 billion, "a crisis of historic proportions," says the Washington Post. Rudy Guiliani's successor, Michael Bloomberg, has watched his popularity plummet to 41 percent, as he proposes raising property taxes 18 percent, piling $3 billion in income taxes on commuters, raising subway fares a third and putting tolls on the Brooklyn Bridge.

The salad days of the Clinton Decade, when the tough decision facing mayors and governors seemed to be whether to spend surpluses on raising teachers' pay or cutting taxes, are over.

The 2001 recession cost 2 million Americans their jobs. It has bitten into tax revenues nationwide and forced higher spending on social services. The bear market has killed the goose that laid those golden eggs called capital gains. And with the U.S. trade deficit over $450 billion, the U.S. manufacturing base – a cornucopia of tax revenue – continues to hollow out.

NAFTA and GATT, the trade deals beloved of the Beltway elite and the multinationals, continue to suck out of America the manufacturing jobs that were the on-ramp to the middle class. This is a central cause of the crisis of upstate New York, over which our pro-NAFTA politicians so copiously weep.

The fat years are over; the lean years are here. While congressmen may have managed to draw up districts so safe that only one in 20 House races is competitive, governors of both parties will spend this present decade on the endangered species list.

New York's crisis, however, pales beside that of the Golden State. Having spent California's cut of Big Tobacco's future profits – to close a $23 billion deficit in this election year – Gov. Gray Davis is now staring at deficits stretching to the end of his new four-year term.

"Hold onto your wallet," warns Nancy Sidhu of the Los Angeles Development Corp. LADC projects "a deficit of $6 billion this year, at least $21 billion in 2003-04 and between $12 billion and $16 billion annually for the next six years."

Adds the Financial Times, "The near-term deficit, approaching 25 percent of California's annual spending, is the most extreme example of the fiscal blight spreading through other states and down to local authorities." Davis' budget crisis can be traced to two causes: loss of 200,000 manufacturing jobs in two years and the devastation wrought to the software industry of Silicon Valley.

But something more ominous is happening to California, akin to what happened to New York after the war. Folks are simply packing up and pulling out. Middle-class Californians, uncomfortable with the radical ethnic changes reshaping the state and weary of the tax load, are leaving for good. In the 1990s, for the first time in history, there was a net out-migration of native-born Californians. Two million left. And as high-income Californians depart, to be replaced by low-wage Latins and Asians who consume more in services than they pay in taxes, California's deficits will explode. And as Gray Davis tries to salvage social programs by squeezing taxpayers even more, even more taxpayers will join the exodus.

California is inexorably headed for Third World status. Tax rates will have to be raised again and again, but immigrant folks picking fruit, working in kitchens and washing cars do not pay the same amount of taxes auto and aerospace workers did. Somebody has to make up the difference. And that somebody is packing up and heading east.

There is no end in sight to the substitution of a new and different California for the old California we all knew. California remains the first choice of final residence for one-third of the 1.5 million aliens who break into this country every year. In the counties of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange, poverty levels soared throughout the 1990s.

Meanwhile, the grandchildren of the Dust Bowl Okies who came west in the 1930s, and the grandkids of the veterans of World War II who came after 1945, are moving to Nevada, Colorado and Idaho. In the last decade, 225,000 left for Arizona. And as those states become more Republican, the Golden State becomes as reliably Democratic as Washington, D.C.

The 1990s were good years for Big Government. In Washington and state capitals, politicians bought popularity and re-election with their unanticipated windfalls of tax dollars. Now the spigot has been cut off. The coming budget wars in state capitals should make for some interesting politics.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: kalifornia; reconquista
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 11/27/2002 7:23:35 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BrowningBAR
Bump!!!
2 posted on 11/27/2002 7:23:58 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Living in the PRC Bump!
3 posted on 11/27/2002 7:30:01 AM PST by dagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Ayn Rand Bump!!!!
4 posted on 11/27/2002 7:33:28 AM PST by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Funny how the article doesn't mention that if government spending were cut back to the pre-market bubble days (let's push it back to about 1994 or 1995) then present day tax intakes would be sufficient to cover what government would be requiring in spending. If peoples' incomes and the economy can suffer a recession and setbacks, then why can't government spending?
5 posted on 11/27/2002 7:45:53 AM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
NY and Cali are third world cess pools that will tap D.C. on the shoulder to pick the pockets of productive Americans, nation wide, to continue to float their illegal immigrant boat.

Before the elections Davis was already tapping D.C. on the shoulder to cover the expense of their socially engineered electricty crisis, in which Americans nation wide are expected to make up the difference between what energy costs and the socialist ceiling placed on how much the California customer can be charged for energy use.

Instead of learning from their mistakes and failed ideology, they want to continue their expensive errors no matter how glaring. Not content to keep their cancer within their state borders they demand it's spread be financed by the rest of the country. I don't like that pip squeak Ross Perot, but he was right when he said there would be a giant sucking sound as America's manufacturing left the country.

Globalist politicans knew good and well when they signed GAT and NAFTA that it was anti-American, and this administration is just as guilty in it's desire to dissolve our sovereign borders and turn America into a third world flop house.

6 posted on 11/27/2002 7:48:24 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Globalist politicans knew good and well when they signed GAT and NAFTA that it was anti-American, and this administration is just as guilty in it's desire to dissolve our sovereign borders and turn America into a third world flop house.

I must repectfully disagree about GATT and NAFTA. I believe both trade deals, while not perfect, had a huge effect in creating the recent prosperity.
7 posted on 11/27/2002 7:51:36 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Debt incurred by State and Local Government adds another $1.4 Trillion to the $6.3 Trillion National Debt racked up by the federal government. That's a total of $7.7 Trillion placed on the backs of taxpayers, and doesn't incude household debt that individuals are personally responsible for.
8 posted on 11/27/2002 7:55:42 AM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: xrp
Somebody tell Pat it's almost 2003, not 1995. California's net loss of population was reversed a long time ago. We have our problems here but it is not all doom and gloom as Pat says. I bet he justs hates staying in some run down hotel, sipping a cold one by the pool, watching the sun slowly set off Malibu when he's out here on his latest book tour.

Why does anyone pay this guy to write anymore. Oh, I forgot, it's World Net Daily.

10 posted on 11/27/2002 7:59:56 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xrp
If peoples' incomes and the economy can suffer a recession and setbacks, then why can't government spending?

Senators Give Raise To Themselves -- Measure To Halt Increase Rejected

11 posted on 11/27/2002 8:02:16 AM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Pat substitutes an "everything's-going-to-sh!t" screed for thoroughgoing analysis, lumping the loss of manufacturing jobs with the recession and market decline, as if a cause-effect relationship is established because all are unwelcome events. Yes, we all know how much Pat glorifies the American "worker", toiling away all day at the coal mine or on the assembly plant, or whatever, and wishing the old times would just come back. Sorry Pat, but the economy has changed. Manufacturing only accounts for a fraction of the economy. And the recession and market decline were caused by speculation, hype, bad predictions, bad accounting, regulations, and an inflow of newbie investors.
A suggestion: stick to demographics rather than economics.
12 posted on 11/27/2002 8:03:14 AM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billybudd
Bump!! Adolf Buchanan needs to stick to what he does best, kissing Arab ass, trashing Jews, and rabble-rousing against Bush and anyother mainstream conservatives. Leave the borders and economics to people who know what they are talking about.
13 posted on 11/27/2002 8:06:38 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Heh...and who would you recommend regarding the borders? No one seems to be doing a damn thing about that ;)
14 posted on 11/27/2002 8:17:05 AM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Why don't these idiots ever mention that the original "salad days" were a direct result of Reaganomics, and the latter ones were a result of Clinton taxing the prosperity out of existence and then using bad accounting procedures to hide the decline until it really built up a head of steam?

Another nice thing to mention would be how some States/Cities actually did maintain fiscal responsibility and either declined to raise taxes, or actually cut them.
Now, the worst that most of those affected citizens haev to go through is a re-institution of taxes that had been cut. Whereas the other places that kept finding new ways to throw the largess away are now deeply in debt....

15 posted on 11/27/2002 8:19:18 AM PST by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp
That would be Tom Tancredo. Buchanan is just a publicity whore.
16 posted on 11/27/2002 8:19:25 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
An ex-Californian here - left 5 weeks ago for reasons other than thse in the article, but I will attest to its truth. The golden days are over; Los Angeles will resemble the rust-belt and eastern cities of the 1970s in short order.
17 posted on 11/27/2002 9:31:22 AM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: happygrl
P.S. "Buh -bye !!"
18 posted on 11/27/2002 9:32:06 AM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
That 70 percent fall in the NASDAQ and 25 percent decline in the Dow, and the recession and unemployment they produced, have begun to cause major collateral damage to municipal and state budgets.

More stupidity from Buchanan: the stock market produces recession and unemployment.

What a moron. He should read a bit more and write a bit less.

19 posted on 11/27/2002 10:00:31 AM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
And the point of these statistics is...
20 posted on 11/27/2002 10:07:17 AM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson