[al_again]

To All,

As the author doesn't describe the censorship, I cannot comment on this issue in particular. However, in the past, I have seen honest conservative debate stifled. It's easy to label 'true-conservatism' as disruptive as it contradicts the current administration and the republican party in certain items.

I am for LESS government, controlled spending, and lower taxes. Unfortunately, the Republican Party has failed miserably when it comes to controlling spending.

We need to have intelligent debate on conservative issues, even if it does offend the Moderators. Censorship of 'conservative'(not Liberal spew) debate is hard to fathom in a forum named 'Free Republic'.

Just my two cents, flame away.

Regards-

[Onelifetogive]

It's easy to label 'true-conservatism' as disruptive...

Give me a break! I've seen racism censored. Threats censored. But "true-conservatism"...I would like to hear examples before I would believe that.

[Neets]

Looks ike you are about 155 posts too late.

Try again tomorrow.

[HighWheeler]

"As the author doesn't describe the censorship, I cannot comment on this issue in particular. However, in the past, I have seen honest conservative debate stifled.

Did you notice that you didn't "describe the cencorship" either? Maybe you need a ZOT!! too.

[zip]

We need to have intelligent debate on conservative issues, even if it does offend the ModeratorsIf it offends the moderators, then it is not appropriate for FR. period.

BTW. the name fits, doesn't it?